Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21655141›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2011

Evaluating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions with computational models in supporting cumulative risk assessment.

Yu-Mei Tan, Harvey Clewell, Jerry Campbell, Melvin Andersen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. NovelToxicology research · 2013
    Review
  9. Science and decisions: advancing toxicology to advance risk assessment.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Deterministic models of inhalational anthrax in New Zealand white rabbits.Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yu-Mei TanNational Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
Harvey Clewell
Jerry Campbell
Melvin Andersen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simultaneous or sequential exposure to multiple chemicals may cause interactions in the pharmacokinetics (PK) and/or pharmacodynamics (PD) of the individual chemicals. Such interactions can cause modification of the internal or target dose/response of one chemical in the mixture by other chemical(s), resulting in a change in the toxicity from that predicted from the summation of the effects of the single chemicals using dose additivity. In such cases, conducting quantitative cumulative risk assessment for chemicals present as a mixture is difficult. The uncertainties that arise from PK interactions can be addressed by developing physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models to describe the disposition of chemical mixtures. Further, PK models can be developed to describe mechanisms of action and tissue responses. In this article, PBPK/PD modeling efforts conducted to investigate chemical interactions at the PK and PD levels are reviewed to demonstrate the use of this predictive modeling framework in assessing health risks associated with exposures to complex chemical mixtures.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsModels, ChemicalPharmacokineticsAnimalsHumansRisk Assessmentmixture interactionspharmacodynamicspharmacokineticsphysiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model

Identifiers

PMID21655141
PMCPMC3108131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.