Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21654736›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2011

μ-Opioid receptor coupling to Gα(o) plays an important role in opioid antinociception.

Jennifer T Lamberts, Emily M Jutkiewicz, Richard M Mortensen, John R Traynor

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. G-protein regulatory network governs receptor internalization dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Structure-based identification of a G protein-biased allosteric modulator of cannabinoid receptor CB1.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Structure-Based Evolution of G Protein-Biased μ-Opioid Receptor Agonists.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Positive allosteric modulation of the mu-opioid receptor produces analgesia with reduced side effects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer T LambertsDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Emily M Jutkiewicz
Richard M Mortensen
John R Traynor
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRAINING IN PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCEST32GM007767 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ISOM, LORI L. · 1985 to 2019
$10.2M
SUBSTANCE ABUSE INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING PROGRAMT32DA007267 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GNEGY, MARGARET E · 1994 to 2015
$4.5M
OPIOID RECEPTOR MECHANISMSR01DA004087 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TRAYNOR, JOHN R. · 1987 to 2010
$2.5M
NIDA NIH HHS DA007267NIDA NIH HHS DA04087NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA004087NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007267NIGMS NIH HHS GM007767NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opioid analgesics elicit their effects via activation of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR), a G protein-coupled receptor known to interact with Gα(i/o)-type G proteins. Work in vitro has suggested that MOR couples preferentially to the abundant brain Gα(i/o) isoform, Gα(o). However, studies in vivo evaluating morphine-mediated antinociception have not supported these findings. The aim of the present work was to evaluate the contribution of Gα(o) to MOR-dependent signaling by measuring both antinociceptive and biochemical endpoints in a Gα(o) null transgenic mouse strain. Male wild-type and Gα(o) heterozygous null (Gα(o) ⁺/⁻) mice were tested for opioid antinociception in the hot plate test or the warm-water tail withdrawal test as measures of supraspinal or spinal antinociception, respectively. Reduction in Gα(o) levels attenuated the supraspinal antinociception produced by morphine, methadone, and nalbuphine, with the magnitude of suppression dependent on agonist efficacy. This was explained by a reduction in both high-affinity MOR expression and MOR agonist-stimulated G protein activation in whole brain homogenates from Gα(o) ⁺/⁻ and Gα(o) homozygous null (Gα(o)⁻/⁻) mice, compared with wild-type littermates. On the other hand, morphine spinal antinociception was not different between Gα(o) ⁺/⁻ and wild-type mice and high-affinity MOR expression was unchanged in spinal cord tissue. However, the action of the partial agonist nalbuphine was compromised, showing that reduction in Gα(o) protein does decrease spinal antinociception, but suggesting a higher Gα(o) protein reserve. These results provide the first in vivo evidence that Gα(o) contributes to maximally efficient MOR signaling and antinociception.

Indexed as

Pain MeasurementAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gi-GoMaleMiceMice, 129 StrainMice, KnockoutMice, TransgenicProtein BindingReceptors, Opioid, muSignal TransductionAnalgesics, OpioidGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gi-GoReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID21654736
PMCPMC3158321
OpenAlexW2056656988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.