Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21654687›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2011

Menopausal symptoms and bone health in women undertaking risk reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: significant bone health issues in those not taking HRT.

J Challberg, L Ashcroft, F Lalloo, B Eckersley, R Clayton, P Hopwood, P Selby, A Howell, D G Evans

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Loss of bone density and bone strength following premenopausal risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: a prospective controlled study (WHAM Study).Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Long-term health consequences of premature or early menopause and considerations for management.Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

J ChallbergDepartment of Genetic Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester Foundation Trust, St Mary's Hospital, 6th Floor, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.
L Ashcroft
F Lalloo
B Eckersley
R Clayton
P Hopwood
P Selby
A Howell
D G Evans

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen at high ovarian cancer risk, especially those with mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2, are encouraged to undergo bilateral risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (BRRSPO) prior to the natural menopause. The decision to use HRT to cover the period of oestrogen deprivation up to 50 years of age is difficult because of balancing the considerations of breast cancer risk, bone and cardiovascular health.

methodsWe reviewed by questionnaire 289 women after BRRSPO aged ≤48 years because of high ovarian cancer risk; 212 (73%) of women responded.

resultsPrevious HRT users (n=67) had significantly worse endocrine symptom scores than 67 current users (P=0.006). A total of 123 (58%) of women had ≥24 months of oestrogen deprivation <50 years with 78 (37%) never taking HRT. Bone density (DXA) evaluations were available on 119 (56%) women: bone loss with a T score of ≤-1.0 was present in 5 out of 31 (16%) women with no period of oestrogen deprivation <50 years compared with 37 out of 78 (47%) of those with ≥24 months of oestrogen deprivation (P=0.03).

interpretationWomen undergoing BRRSPO <50 years should be counselled concerning the risks/benefits of HRT, taking into consideration the benefits on symptoms, bone health and cardiovascular health, and that the risks of breast cancer from oestrogen-only HRT appear to be relatively small.

Indexed as

Estrogen Replacement TherapyMenopauseOvariectomySalpingostomyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone and BonesFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseHealth StatusHumansMiddle AgedOvarian Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID21654687
PMCPMC3137416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.