Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21654682›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of cancer2011

Measurement of GSTP1 promoter methylation in body fluids may complement PSA screening: a meta-analysis.

T Wu, E Giovannucci, J Welge, P Mallick, W-Y Tang, S-M Ho

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Glutathione-S-TransferaseInternational journal of endocrinology · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

T WuDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA. tianying.wu@uc.edu
E Giovannucci
J Welge
P Mallick
W-Y Tang
S-M Ho
University of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USHarvard University · US

Funding

REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICOLOGY RESEARCHP30ES006096 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI YADAV, JAGJIT S · 1992 to 2022
$35.4M
CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR026314 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HEUBI, JAMES E. · 2009 to 2011
$14.3M
Epigenetic Basis for Prostate Carcinogenesis following Early Estrogenic ExposuresR01ES015584 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI HO, SHUK-MEI, PRINS, GAIL S · 2008 to 2012
$3.1M
Developmental Reprogramming of Prostate Carcinogenesis by BPARC2ES018789 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HO, SHUK-MEI, MANCINI, MICHAEL A. · 2009 to 2010
$1.9M
Developmental Exposure to Low-dose Bisphenol A and Human Prostate Cancer SusceptiRC2ES018758 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI HO, SHUK-MEI, PRINS, GAIL S · 2009 to 2010
$1.9M
Hormone-induced inflammation and prostate cancerR01CA112532 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HO, SHUK-MEI · 2006 to 2009
$1.1M
Global and Specific Oxidation Pathways Related to Prostate Cancer, Prospective anK07CA138714 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI WU, TIANYING · 2010 to 2014
$821k
Estrogens/Xenoestrogens and Epigenetic Regulation of Gene ExpressionR00ES016817 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TANG, WAN-YEE · 2010 to 2012
$747k
Estrogens/Xenoestrogens and Epigenetic Regulation of Gene ExpressionK99ES016817 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI TANG, WAN-YEE · 2008 to 2009
$180k
NCI NIH HHS CA112532NCI NIH HHS K07 CA138714NCI NIH HHS K07CA138714-01NCI NIH HHS R01 CA112532NCRR NIH HHS 1UL1RR026314-01NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR026314NIEHS NIH HHS 1RC2-ES018758NIEHS NIH HHS ES006096NIEHS NIH HHS ES018758NIEHS NIH HHS K99 ES016817NIEHS NIH HHS K99ES016817NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES006096NIEHS NIH HHS P30-ES006096NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES016817NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES015584NIEHS NIH HHS R01ES015584NIEHS NIH HHS RC2 ES018758NIEHS NIH HHS RC2 ES018789NIEHS NIH HHS RC2-ES018789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has low specificity. Assessment of methylation status in body fluids may complement PSA screening if the test has high specificity.

methodThe purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis of the sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer detection of glutathione-s-transferase-π (GSTP1) methylation in body fluids (plasma, serum, whole blood, urine, ejaculate, and prostatic secretions). We conducted a comprehensive literature search on Medline (Pubmed). We included studies if they met all four of the following criteria: (1) measurement of DNA methylation in body fluids; (2) a case-control or case-only design; (3) publication in an English journal; and (4) adult subjects. Reviewers conducted data extraction independently using a standardised protocol. Twenty-two studies were finally included in this paper. Primer sequences and methylation method in each study were summarised and evaluated using meta-analyses. This paper represents a unique cross-disciplinary approach to molecular epidemiology.

resultsThe pooled specificity of GSTP1 promoter methylation measured in plasma, serum, and urine samples from negative-biopsy controls was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.80-0.95). Stratified analyses consistently showed a high specificity across different sample types and methylation methods (include both primer sequences and location). The pooled sensitivity was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.40-0.64).

conclusionsThe pooled specificity of GSTP1 promoter methylation measures in plasma, serum, and urine was excellent and much higher than the specificity of PSA. The sensitivity of GSTP1 was modest, no higher than that of PSA. These results suggest that measurement of GSTP1 promoter methylation in plasma, serum, or urine samples may complement PSA screening for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationBiomarkers, TumorBody FluidsCase-Control StudiesDNA, NeoplasmDNA PrimersGlutathione S-Transferase piHumansMalePolymerase Chain ReactionPromoter Regions, GeneticProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorDNA, NeoplasmDNA PrimersGlutathione S-Transferase piGSTP1 protein, humanProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID21654682
PMCPMC3137397
OpenAlexW2144823751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.