ArticleBritish journal of cancer2011
Increasing rates of cervical cancer in young women in England: an analysis of national data 1982-2006.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparative analysis of somatic mutational profiles according to HIV status among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 (CIN3): a focus on hotspots in TP53, PIK3CA, PTEN, and EGFR.Infectious agents and cancer · 2025Article
- Age-Specific Trends of Invasive Cervical Cancer Incidence in British Columbia, Canada, 1971-2017.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- A Comparison of the National Cervical Cancer Policies in Six Developing Countries with the World Health Organization Recommendations: A Narrative Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2023Review
- Article
- Regional differences in cervical cancer incidence and associated risk behaviors among Norwegian women: a population-based study.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Bazedoxifene, a GP130 Inhibitor, Modulates EMT Signaling and Exhibits Antitumor Effects in HPV-Positive Cervical Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- High-resolution anoscopy, is there a benefit in proceeding directly to the operating room?Techniques in coloproctology · 2021Article
- Cervical cancer in women under 30 years of age in Norway: a population-based cohort study.BMC women's health · 2021Article
- The Effects of Age, Period, and Cohort on the Mortality of Cervical Cancer in Three High-Income Countries: Canada, Korea, and Italy.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Article
- Elastic Net-Based Identification of a Multigene Combination Predicting the Survival of Patients with Cervical Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019Article
- Article
- Is the recent increase in cervical cancer in women aged 20-24years in England a cause for concern?Preventive medicine · 2018Article
- Raising Awareness About Cervical Cancer Using Twitter: Content Analysis of the 2015 #SmearForSmear Campaign.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Article
- Association of HLA-DRB1, HLA-DQB1 Polymorphisms with HPV 16 E6 Variants among Young Cervical Cancer Patients in China.Journal of Cancer · 2017Article
- Preventable fractions of cervical cancer via effective screening in six Baltic, central, and eastern European countries 2017-40: a population-based study.The Lancet. Oncology · 2016Article
- High-Risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Infection and Cervical Cancer Prevention in Britain: Evidence of Differential Uptake of Interventions from a Probability Survey.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2015Article
- Trends in Cervical Cancer Among Delivery-Related Discharges and its Impact on Maternal-Infant Birth Outcomes (United States, 1998-2009).The open nursing journal · 2015Article
- Characteristics and screening history of women diagnosed with cervical cancer aged 20-29 years.British journal of cancer · 2013Article
- Cervical cancer incidence in young women: a historical and geographic controlled UK regional population study.British journal of cancer · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn England, cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women aged under 35 years. Overall incidence of cervical cancer has decreased since the introduction of the national screening programme in 1988 but recent trends of incidence in young women have not been studied in detail.
methodsInformation on 71,511 incident cases of cervical cancer in England, 1982-2006, in 20-79-year-olds was extracted from a national cancer registration database. Changes in incidence were analysed by age group, time period and birth cohort. Poisson regression was used to estimate annual percentage change (APC).
resultsOverall incidence, during 1982-2006, fell significantly from 213 to 112 per million person years. However, in 20-29-year-olds, after an initial fall, incidence increased significantly during 1992-2006, (APC 2.16). In 30-39-year-olds incidence stabilised during the latter part of the study period. The pattern was most marked in the North East, Yorkshire and the Humber and East Midlands regions. Birth cohorts that were initially called for screening between 60-64 and 35-39 years of age show an incidence peak soon after the age of presumed first screen, whereas younger birth cohorts show a peak at about 35 years of age. Incidence in the 1977-1981 birth cohort has increased relative to that among women born between 1962 and 1976.
conclusionThese results have implications for cervical screening, human papilloma virus vaccination and other public health interventions targeting young people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.