Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21653764›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2011

Detection of AmpC beta-lactamase in Escherichia coli: comparison of three phenotypic confirmation assays and genetic analysis.

S Peter-Getzlaff, S Polsfuss, M Poledica, M Hombach, J Giger, E C Böttger, R Zbinden, G V Bloemberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Characterization ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

S Peter-GetzlaffUniversity of Zurich, Institute of Medical Microbiology, Gloriastrasse 30/32, CH 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.
S Polsfuss
M Poledica
M Hombach
J Giger
E C Böttger
R Zbinden
G V Bloemberg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two mechanisms account for AmpC activity in Escherichia coli, namely, mutations in the ampC promoter and attenuator regions resulting in ampC overexpression and acquisition of plasmid-carried ampC genes. In this study, we analyzed 51 clinical E. coli isolates with reduced susceptibility to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, piperacillin-tazobactam, or extended-spectrum cephalosporins for the presence of AmpC production. Three phenotypic AmpC confirmation assays (cefoxitin-cloxacillin disk diffusion test, cefoxitin-EDTA disk diffusion test, and AmpC Etest) were compared for the detection of AmpC activity. All 51 isolates were characterized genetically by mutational analysis of the chromosomal ampC promoter/attenuator region and by PCR detection of plasmid-carried ampC genes. Altogether, 21/51 (41%) E. coli isolates were considered true AmpC producers. AmpC activity due to chromosomal ampC promoter/attenuator mutations was found in 12/21 strains, and plasmid-carried ampC genes were detected in 8/21 isolates. One strain contained both ampC promoter mutations and a plasmid-carried ampC gene. All three phenotypic tests were able to detect the majority (>90%) of AmpC-positive strains correctly. Cefoxitin resistance was found to be a discriminative parameter, detecting 20/21 AmpC-producing strains. Susceptibility to extended-spectrum cephalosporins, e.g., ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, and cefotaxime, was found in 9 of the 21 AmpC-positive strains. Considering the elevated zone diameter breakpoints of the 2010 CLSI guidelines, 2/21 AmpC-positive strains were categorized as susceptible to extended-spectrum cephalosporins.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamasesbeta-LactamsDNA Mutational AnalysisEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPlasmidsPolymerase Chain ReactionPromoter Regions, GeneticAmpC beta-lactamasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamasesbeta-Lactams

Identifiers

PMID21653764
PMCPMC3147754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.