Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21653716›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2011

Modules in the brain stem and spinal cord underlying motor behaviors.

Jinsook Roh, Vincent C K Cheung, Emilio Bizzi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07531264 (Neuro-Intermuscular Coordination Enhancement), which is not on this map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07531264 early_phase1not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2027, after this paper: background citation

Neuro-Intermuscular Coordination Enhancement (NICE) Rehabilitation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of HoustonRan2027 to 2032Enrolled48ConditionsChronic Stroke-related Upper-extremity Motor Impairment, Motor Module-guided Rehabilitation Targeting Impaired Intermuscular Coordination and Motor RecoveryArmsNeuromuscular coordination enhancement (NICE) intervention, EMG Amplitude Biofeedback Exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Neuromotor modules revealed by direct electrical stimulation of the human primary motor cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. A spinal substrate for modular control of natural behavior.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jinsook RohMcGovern Institute for Brain Research and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. j-roh@northwestern.edu
Vincent C K Cheung
Emilio Bizzi

Funding

Transformation of Planned Hand Movements into Motor Commands by the Motor CortexP01NS044393 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI TURNER, ROBERT STERLING · 2003 to 2013
$12.2M
NINDS NIH HHS NS-044393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies using intact and spinalized animals have suggested that coordinated movements can be generated by appropriate combinations of muscle synergies controlled by the central nervous system (CNS). However, which CNS regions are responsible for expressing muscle synergies remains an open question. We address whether the brain stem and spinal cord are involved in expressing muscle synergies used for executing a range of natural movements. We analyzed the electromyographic (EMG) data recorded from frog leg muscles before and after transection at different levels of the neuraxis-rostral midbrain (brain stem preparations), rostral medulla (medullary preparations), and the spinal-medullary junction (spinal preparations). Brain stem frogs could jump, swim, kick, and step, while medullary frogs could perform only a partial repertoire of movements. In spinal frogs, cutaneous reflexes could be elicited. Systematic EMG analysis found two different synergy types: 1) synergies shared between pre- and posttransection states and 2) synergies specific to individual states. Almost all synergies found in natural movements persisted after transection at rostral midbrain or medulla but not at the spinal-medullary junction for swim and step. Some pretransection- and posttransection-specific synergies for a certain behavior appeared as shared synergies for other motor behaviors of the same animal. These results suggest that the medulla and spinal cord are sufficient for the expression of most muscle synergies in frog behaviors. Overall, this study provides further evidence supporting the idea that motor behaviors may be constructed by muscle synergies organized within the brain stem and spinal cord and activated by descending commands from supraspinal areas.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain StemElectromyographyMotor ActivityRana catesbeianaSpinal Cord

Identifiers

PMID21653716
PMCPMC3174810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.