Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21652775›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011

μ-Conotoxins that differentially block sodium channels NaV1.1 through 1.8 identify those responsible for action potentials in sciatic nerve.

Michael J Wilson, Doju Yoshikami, Layla Azam, Joanna Gajewiak, Baldomero M Olivera, Grzegorz Bulaj, Min-Min Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Malacologia · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Mechanisms Underlying the Selective Therapeutic Efficacy of Carbamazepine for Attenuation of Trigeminal Nerve Injury Pain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Small cyclic sodium channel inhibitors.Biochemical pharmacology · 2021
    Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Michael J WilsonDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Doju Yoshikami
Layla Azam
Joanna Gajewiak
Baldomero M Olivera
Grzegorz Bulaj
Min-Min Zhang
University of Utah · US

Funding

Venoms, Biological Resources, Molecular BiologyP01GM048677 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BANDYOPADHYAY, PRADIP K · 1993 to 2018
$32.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 48677NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM048677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs) are important for action potentials. There are seven major isoforms of the pore-forming and gate-bearing α-subunit (Na(V)1) of VGSCs in mammalian neurons, and a given neuron can express more than one isoform. Five of the neuronal isoforms, Na(V)1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.6, and 1.7, are exquisitely sensitive to tetrodotoxin (TTX), and a functional differentiation of these presents a serious challenge. Here, we examined a panel of 11 μ-conopeptides for their ability to block rodent Na(V)1.1 through 1.8 expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Although none blocked Na(V)1.8, a TTX-resistant isoform, the resulting "activity matrix" revealed that the panel could readily discriminate between the members of all pair-wise combinations of the tested isoforms. To examine the identities of endogenous VGSCs, a subset of the panel was tested on A- and C-compound action potentials recorded from isolated preparations of rat sciatic nerve. The results show that the major subtypes in the corresponding A- and C-fibers were Na(V)1.6 and 1.7, respectively. Ruled out as major players in both fiber types were Na(V)1.1, 1.2, and 1.3. These results are consistent with immunohistochemical findings of others. To our awareness this is the first report describing a qualitative pharmacological survey of TTX-sensitive Na(V)1 isoforms responsible for propagating action potentials in peripheral nerve. The panel of μ-conopeptides should be useful in identifying the functional contributions of Na(V)1 isoforms in other preparations.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsConotoxinsNeurotoxinsOocytesPatch-Clamp TechniquesProtein IsoformsRatsSciatic NerveSodium Channel BlockersSodium ChannelsXenopus laevisConotoxinsNeurotoxinsProtein IsoformsSodium Channel BlockersSodium Channels

Identifiers

PMID21652775
PMCPMC3121861
OpenAlexW2118129389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.