Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21652524›Full record

ArticleGenetics2011

On the fixation process of a beneficial mutation in a variable environment.

Hildegard Uecker, Joachim Hermisson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Fixation Probabilities of Mutant Alleles in an Ecological Context.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The adaptive state determines the impact of mutations on evolving populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evolutionary rescue on genotypic fitness landscapes.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The phoenix hypothesis of speciation.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hildegard UeckerMathematics and Biosciences Group, Faculty of Mathematics and Max F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. hildegard.uecker@univie.ac.at
Joachim Hermisson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A population that adapts to gradual environmental change will typically experience temporal variation in its population size and the selection pressure. On the basis of the mathematical theory of inhomogeneous branching processes, we present a framework to describe the fixation process of a single beneficial allele under these conditions. The approach allows for arbitrary time-dependence of the selection coefficient s(t) and the population size N(t), as may result from an underlying ecological model. We derive compact analytical approximations for the fixation probability and the distribution of passage times for the beneficial allele to reach a given intermediate frequency. We apply the formalism to several biologically relevant scenarios, such as linear or cyclic changes in the selection coefficient, and logistic population growth. Comparison with computer simulations shows that the analytical results are accurate for a large parameter range, as long as selection is not very weak.

Indexed as

AllelesEnvironmentAlgorithmsAnimalsComputer SimulationGenetics, PopulationHumansModels, GeneticMutationPopulation DensityProbabilitySelection, GeneticTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID21652524
PMCPMC3176092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.