ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2011
Comment on the paper by Quinn and Fromme entitled subjective response to alcohol challenge: a quantitative review.
Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute alcohol response phenotype in heavy social drinkers is robust and reproducible.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2014Trial
- Individual differences in biological regulation: Predicting vulnerability to drug addiction, obesity, and other dysregulatory disorders.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2020Article
- Brown adipose tissue thermogenesis does not explain the intra-administration hyperthermic sign-reversal induced by serial administrations of 60% nitrous oxide to rats.Journal of thermal biology · 2016Article
- Factor Structure of Subjective Responses to Alcohol in Light and Heavy Drinkers.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2015Article
- Predicting addictive vulnerability: individual differences in initial responding to a drug's pharmacological effects.PloS one · 2015Article
- Subjective perceptions associated with the ascending and descending slopes of breath alcohol exposure vary with recent drinking history.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis commentary discusses the recent paper by Quinn and Fromme (2011), placing their results into perspective.
resultsQuinn and Fromme's meta-analysis is an important and useful synthesis of a complex literature. It is clear, well written, and well reasoned, with conclusions that are relevant to both the Low Level of Response Model and the Differentiator Model.
conclusionsDrs. Quinn and Fromme use a thorough and thoughtful approach, and I encourage researchers to address the important questions raised by their meta-analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21651583What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.