Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21649839›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2011

A titrate-to-goal study of switching patients uncontrolled on antihypertensive monotherapy to fixed-dose combinations of amlodipine and olmesartan medoxomil ± hydrochlorothiazide.

Matthew R Weir, Willa A Hsueh, Shawna D Nesbitt, Thomas J Littlejohn, Alan Graff, Ali Shojaee, William F Waverczak, Chunlin Qian, Christopher J Jones, Joel M Neutel

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Hypertension Treatment with Angiotensin Receptor Blockers and Other Antihypertensive Agents: A Real-World Registry from a High-Volume Specialized Center Over TwoDecades.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Observational
  12. Single-Pill Combination with Three Antihypertensive Agents to Improve Blood Pressure Control in Hypertension: Focus on Olmesartan-Based Combinations.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Hypertension Control Rate Should be Defined Consistently and Used to Motivate Action to Improve.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Calcium Channel Blockers for the Clinical Management of Hypertension.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2018
    Article
  18. Triple Combination Therapies Based on Olmesartan: A Personalized Therapeutic Approach to Improve Blood Pressure Control.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2017
    Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matthew R WeirUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. mweir@medicine.umaryland.edu
Willa A Hsueh
Shawna D Nesbitt
Thomas J Littlejohn
Alan Graff
Ali Shojaee
William F Waverczak
Chunlin Qian
Christopher J Jones
Joel M Neutel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the prospective, open-label, titrate-to-goal Blood Pressure Control in All Subgroups With Hypertension (BP-CRUSH) study, 999 patients with hypertension uncontrolled on monotherapy (mean age, 55.6 ± 11.4 years; baseline blood pressure [BP], 153.7 ± 9.2/91.9 ± 8.6 mm Hg) were switched to fixed-dose amlodipine/olmesartan medoxomil (AML/OM) 5/20 mg. Patients were uptitrated every 4 weeks to AML/OM 5/40 mg and 10/40 mg to achieve BP < 120/70 mm Hg. Patients were subsequently uptitrated every 4 weeks to AML/OM+hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 10/40+12.5 mg and 10/40+25 mg to achieve BP <125/75 mm Hg. The primary end point, the cumulative percentage of patients achieving seated systolic BP < 140 mm Hg (< 130 mm Hg for patients with diabetes) by week 12, was 75.8%. The mean (± standard error) BP changes from baseline during the titration periods ranged from -14.2±0.4 mm Hg/-7.7 ± 0.3 mm Hg for AML/OM 5/20 mg to -25.1 ± 0.7 mm Hg/-13.7 ± 0.4 mm Hg for AML/OM+HCTZ 10/40+25 mg. By week 20, the cumulative BP threshold of <140/90 mm Hg was achieved by 90.3% of patients. An ambulatory BP monitoring substudy (n=243) showed that 24-hour efficacy was maintained. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), mostly mild to moderate in severity, occurred in 529 patients (53.0%). Drug-related TEAEs occurred in 255 patients (25.5%). This well-tolerated, treat-to-goal algorithm enabled a large proportion of patients with uncontrolled hypertension on monotherapy to safely achieve BP control on single-pill AML/OM combination therapy or triple therapy with the addition of HCTZ. .

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAmlodipineAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHydrochlorothiazideHypertensionImidazolesMaleAmlodipineAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersHydrochlorothiazideImidazolesolmesartanTetrazoles

Identifiers

PMID21649839
PMCPMC8108858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.