ReviewCNS drugs2011
Suicidal ideation during antidepressant treatment: do genetic predictors exist?
Review in CNS drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- A randomized controlled pilot trial of classroom-based mindfulness meditation compared to an active control condition in sixth-grade children.Journal of school psychology · 2014Trial
- A systematic safety assessment of zuranolone: real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database.Archives of women's mental health · 2026Article
- Genome-wide association study identified six loci associated with adverse drug reactions to aripiprazole in schizophrenia patients.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) concentration and thePharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2019Article
- Pharmacogenetics and Imaging-Pharmacogenetics of Antidepressant Response: Towards Translational Strategies.CNS drugs · 2016Review
- Gene-environment interaction in major depression: focus on experience-dependent biological systems.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2015Review
- L-acetylcarnitine causes rapid antidepressant effects through the epigenetic induction of mGlu2 receptors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013Article
- Genome-wide association study of antidepressant treatment-emergent suicidal ideation.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suicidal thoughts during antidepressant treatment have recently been the focus of several candidate gene and genome-wide association studies. Although the clinical risk factors for such events are well known, unfortunately they do not help to predict who will have a suicidal event during antidepressant treatment and who will not. Pharmacogenomic studies have therefore attempted to use genetic variants to predict individual susceptibility to treatment-related suicidal ideation. In this perspective, several genetic predictors have been highlighted, the majority of which relate to common mechanisms of antidepressant action: genes involved in the neurotrophic and synaptic plasticity systems (CREB1, and BDNF and its receptor NTRK2), noradrenergic system (ADRA2A), glutamatergic system (GRIA3, GRIK2 and GDA), inflammatory and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis systems (IL28RA and FKBP5) and in other brain functions (PAPLN, APOO, KCNIP4 and ELP3). Although some of these genes may be of interest in predicting antidepressant-induced suicidal ideation, they still need to be validated in better phenotypically designed samples. Several methodological factors are indeed responsible for the problems involved in implicating these findings in the causation of a clinically relevant phenotype. These include discrepancies between studies in defining phenotypes, with several different thresholds used to establish significant suicidal ideation; the use of scales not truly designed to measure suicidal ideation; and the paucity of true suicidal events (suicide attempts and/or completion) in pharmacogenomic studies. In conclusion, pharmacogenomic studies are far from fulfilling their promise. There is a need for future pharmacogenetic studies targeting events that are clinically significant in order to find associated variants that will help clinicians to improve their treatment strategies. While awaiting these genetic predictors, clinicians need to bear in mind that all studies in this field support a beneficial effect of antidepressants on suicidal ideation. This should therefore encourage them to prescribe antidepressant medication even in patients with suicidal ideation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.