Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21647871›Full record

ArticleCancer2011

A phase 1b trial of the combination of the antiangiogenic agent sunitinib and radiation therapy for patients with primary and metastatic central nervous system malignancies.

Evan J Wuthrick, Mitchell Kamrava, Walter J Curran, Maria Werner-Wasik, Kevin A Camphausen, Terry Hyslop, Rita Axelrod, David W Andrews, Jon Glass, Mitchell Machtay and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Microenvironment and radiation therapy.BioMed research international · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Evan J WuthrickDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA.
Mitchell Kamrava
Walter J Curran
Maria Werner-Wasik
Kevin A Camphausen
Terry Hyslop
Rita Axelrod
David W Andrews
Jon Glass
Mitchell Machtay
Adam P Dicker
Thomas Jefferson University · USNational Cancer Institute · USSidney Kimmel Cancer Center · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

X-Ray Crystallography and Macromolecular CharacterizationP30CA056036 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI DANIEL P SILVER · 1995 to 2026
$94.8M
Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN W BYERS · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
The Synergy Between Radiotherapy and Molecularly Targeted AgentsZIASC010373 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI CAMPHAUSEN, KEVIN · 2009 to 2025
$22.2M
Intramural NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS P30 CA056036NCI NIH HHS P30 CA056036-08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this phase 1 trial, the authors evaluated sunitinib combined with radiation therapy (RT) for the treatment of primary or metastatic central nervous system (CNS) malignancies.

methodsEligible patients had CNS malignancies that required a (minimum) 2-week course of RT. Sunitinib (37.5 mg) was administered daily for the duration of RT with optional treatment extension of 1 month. Urine was collected at 3 time points for correlative biomarker studies. The primary endpoint was acute toxicity defined according to Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.

resultsFifteen patients were enrolled (12 with CNS metastasis and 3 with primary tumors). RT doses ranged from 14 Gray (Gy) to 70 Gy (1.8-3.5 Gy per fraction). Acute toxicities included hematologic, nausea, hyperglycemia, fatigue, hypocalcemia, and diarrhea. Six patients (40%) developed grade ≤ 2 toxicities. Grade 3 toxicities occurred in 7 patients (47%) and included hematologic toxicity, fatigue, deep vein thrombosis, dysphasia, hyperglycemia, and hyponatremia. No grade 3 through 5 hypertensive events or intracerebral hemorrhages occurred. Two grade 5 adverse events attributed to disease progression occurred. The median follow-up was 34.2 months. Two patients (13%) achieved a partial response, 9 patients (60%) had stable disease, and 2 patients (13%) patients had progressive disease. The 6-month progression-free survival rate for patients who had brain metastasis was 58%. Grade 3 hematologic toxicity was correlated with greater changes in vascular endothelial growth factor levels changes between baseline and the completion of RT.

conclusionsContinuous 37.5-mg sunitinib combined with RT in patients who had CNS malignancies yielded acceptable toxicities and adverse events. The current results indicated that changes in urine vascular endothelial growth factor levels are associated with hematologic toxicity, and this association should be analyzed in a larger cohort. The feasibility, safety, and early response results warrant a phase 2 trial.

Indexed as

AgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansIndolesMaleMatrix Metalloproteinase 2Matrix Metalloproteinase 9Middle AgedPyrrolesRadiotherapy DosageSunitinibSurvival AnalysisAngiogenesis InhibitorsBiomarkers, TumorIndolesMatrix Metalloproteinase 2Matrix Metalloproteinase 9PyrrolesSunitinibVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID21647871
PMCPMC3170674
OpenAlexW2094761743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.