Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21647723›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2011

Searching for major urinary proteins (MUPs) as chemosignals in urine of subterranean rodents.

Petra Hagemeyer, Sabine Begall, Katerina Janotova, Josephine Todrank, Giora Heth, Petr L Jedelsky, Hynek Burda, Pavel Stopka

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Petra HagemeyerDepartment of General Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Sabine Begall
Katerina Janotova
Josephine Todrank
Giora Heth
Petr L Jedelsky
Hynek Burda
Pavel Stopka
Charles University · CZUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEUniversity of Haifa · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemosensory information mediates behavior in many rodent genera. Major Urinary Proteins (MUPs) facilitate chemical communication in some species of mice. We sought to demonstrate the importance of MUPs in chemosignaling across a range of rodent genera that live in different habitats and social structures. We analyzed urine from three subterranean rodent genera from different continents, and with diverse social systems: eusocial Zambian mole-rats (Fukomys), solitary Israeli blind mole rats (Spalax), and social Chilean coruros (Spalacopus). 2D gel electrophoresis revealed low levels of protein, with sequences similar to aphrodisin, in Fukomys mole-rat urine, but no MUPs in urine of any of the studied species. Previous research demonstrated that subjects from the tested genera responded differentially to odors indicating transmission of individuality, family/colony or population, species, and reproductive state in secretions and excretions of conspecifics. This extends, to subterranean rodents, the evidence that rodent species can successfully transmit and receive chemosignals without the necessity of MUPs.

Indexed as

ProteinsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalFemaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMole RatsOdorantsPheromonesRatsSmellSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationUrineaphrodisin protein, Mesocricetus auratusmajor urinary proteinsPheromonesProteins

Identifiers

PMID21647723
OpenAlexW2078376596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.