Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21647654›Full record

Trial reportDigestive diseases and sciences2011

Double-blind randomized controlled trial of rifaximin for persistent symptoms in patients with celiac disease.

Matthew S Chang, Maria T Minaya, Jianfeng Cheng, Bradley A Connor, Suzanne K Lewis, Peter H R Green

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01137955 (Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Rifaximin for Persistent Symptoms in Patients With Celiac Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01137955 nacompletednot on this map

Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Rifaximin for Persistent Symptoms in Patients With Celiac Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2006 to 2008Enrolled50ConditionsCeliac DiseaseArmsRifaximin, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Critical Review: The Past, Present, and Future of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO).JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth among patients with celiac disease unresponsive to a gluten free diet.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Matthew S ChangDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Maria T Minaya
Jianfeng Cheng
Bradley A Connor
Suzanne K Lewis
Peter H R Green
Columbia College · CARoyal College of Physicians · GBCornell University · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmall intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is one cause of a poor response to a gluten-free diet (GFD) and persistent symptoms in celiac disease. Rifaximin has been reported to improve symptoms in non-controlled trials.

aimsTo determine the effect of rifaximin on gastrointestinal symptoms and lactulose-hydrogen breath tests in patients with poorly responsive celiac disease.

methodsA single-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of patients with biopsy-proven celiac disease and persistent gastrointestinal symptoms despite a GFD was conducted. Patients were randomized to placebo (n = 25) or rifaximin (n = 25) 1,200 mg daily for 10 days. They completed the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and underwent lactulose-hydrogen breath tests at weeks 0, 2, and 12. An abnormal breath test was defined as: (1) a rise in hydrogen of ≥20 parts per million (ppm) within 100 min, or (2) two peaks ≥20 ppm over baseline.

resultsGSRS scores were unaffected by treatment with rifaximin, regardless of baseline breath tests. In a multivariable regression model, the duration of patients' gastrointestinal symptoms significantly predicted their overall GSRS scores (estimate 0.029, p < 0.006). According to criteria 1 and 2, respectively, SIBO was present in 55 and 8% of patients at baseline, intermittently present in 28 and 20% given placebo, and 28 and 12% given rifaximin. There was no difference in the prevalence of SIBO between placebo and treatment groups at weeks 2 and 12.

conclusionsRifaximin does not improve patients' reporting of gastrointestinal symptoms and hydrogen breath tests do not reliably identify who will respond to antibiotic therapy.

Indexed as

AdultBreath TestsCeliac DiseaseDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGastrointestinal AgentsHumansHydrogenLactuloseMaleMiddle AgedRegression AnalysisRifamycinsRifaximinTreatment OutcomeGastrointestinal AgentsHydrogenLactuloseRifamycinsRifaximin

Identifiers

PMID21647654
OpenAlexW2019087572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.