Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21647438›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Nitric oxide synthase inhibition enhances the antitumor effect of radiation in the treatment of squamous carcinoma xenografts.

Robert J G Cardnell, Ross B Mikkelsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Application of nano-radiosensitizers in combination cancer therapy.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Sepiapterin Enhances Tumor Radio- and Chemosensitivities by Promoting Vascular Normalization.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2018
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The implications of hyponitroxia in cancer.Translational oncology · 2014
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert J G CardnellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America. rjcardnell@vcu.edu
Ross B Mikkelsen
Virginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

RADIOSENSITIZATION OF MALIGNANT GLIOMAS BY VIRAL TRANSDUCTION WITH WILD-TYPE P53P01CA072955 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI VALERIE, KRISTOFFER CARL · 1998 to 2007
$6.0M
RAD-Induced Nitric Oxide &Cellular RadiosensitivityR01CA090881 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MIKKELSEN, ROSS B · 2002 to 2012
$2.4M
RADIATION, ERBB ACTIVATION AND CELLULAR GROWTH CONTROLR01CA065896 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MIKKELSEN, ROSS B · 1995 to 2008
$2.0M
Training in Radiation Oncology Translational ResearchT32CA113277 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MIKKELSEN, ROSS B · 2007 to 2011
$997k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA072955NCI NIH HHS P01 CA72955NCI NIH HHS R01 CA065896NCI NIH HHS R01 CA090881NCI NIH HHS R01-CA65896NCI NIH HHS R01-CA90881NCI NIH HHS T32 CA113277NCI NIH HHS T32-CA113277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study tests whether the nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor, N(G)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA), combines favorably with ionizing radiation (IR) in controlling squamous carcinoma tumor growth. Animals bearing FaDu and A431 xenografts were treated with L-NNA in the drinking water. IR exposure was 10 Gy for tumor growth and survival studies and 4 Gy for ex vivo clonogenic assays. Cryosections were examined immunohistochemically for markers of apoptosis and hypoxia. Blood flow was assayed by fluorescent microscopy of tissue cryosections after i.v. injection of fluorospheres. Orally administered L-NNA for 24 hrs reduces tumor blood flow by 80% (p<0.01). Within 24 hrs L-NNA treatment stopped tumor growth for at least 10 days before tumor growth again ensued. The growth arrest was in part due to increased cell killing since a combination of L-NNA and a single 4 Gy IR caused 82% tumor cell killing measured by an ex vivo clonogenic assay compared to 49% by L-NNA or 29% by IR alone. A Kaplan-Meyer analysis of animal survival revealed a distinct survival advantage for the combined treatment. Combining L-NNA and IR was also found to be at least as effective as a single i.p. dose of cisplatin plus IR. In contrast to the in vivo studies, exposure of cells to L-NNA in vitro was without effect on clonogenicity with or without IR. Western and immunochemical analysis of expression of a number of proteins involved in NO signaling indicated that L-NNA treatment enhanced arginase-2 expression and that this may represent vasculature remodeling and escape from NOS inhibition. For tumors such as head and neck squamous carcinomas that show only modest responses to inhibitors of specific angiogenic pathways, targeting NO-dependent pro-survival and angiogenic mechanisms in both tumor and supporting stromal cells may present a potential new strategy for tumor control.

Indexed as

Xenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisBlood VolumeCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCisplatinEnzyme InhibitorsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMiceNitric Oxide SynthaseNitroarginineAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinEnzyme InhibitorsNitric Oxide SynthaseNitroarginine

Identifiers

PMID21647438
PMCPMC3102067
OpenAlexW1968838650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.