Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21646629›Full record

ArticleNeurology2011

Assessment of sympathetic index from the Valsalva maneuver.

Peter Novak

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Hemodynamic orthostatic dizziness/vertigo: Diagnostic criteria.Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Cerebral vasomotor reactivity during hypo- and hypercapnia across the adult lifespan.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2020
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neurocardiology - from basics to clinic.World journal of cardiology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Responses to Valsalva's maneuver in spinal cord injury do not broadly relate to vasoconstrictor capacity.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Network autonomic analysis of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 and postural tachycardia syndrome.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Effects of Oral Leak Size on Valsalva Responses.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2022
    Article
  20. Do indices of baroreflex failure and peripheral noradrenergic deficiency predict the magnitude of orthostatic hypotension in Lewy body diseases?Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter NovakAutonomic Center, University of Massachusetts, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01655, USA. novakp@ummhc.org

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBlood pressure (BP) decline and recovery during the Valsalva maneuver (VM) are used to evaluate the degree of sympathetic failure (SF) but a reliable sympathetic index (SI) derived from VM is lacking.

methodsPatients with mild (n=20), moderate (n=65), and severe (n=60) SF and 23 healthy controls were evaluated using a standardized battery of autonomic tests. SF was defined as mild (associated with reduced sudomotor volumes at distal leg); moderate (associated with a fall in systolic BP ≥10< 30 mm Hg during the tilt test); and severe (associated with a fall in systolic BP ≥30 mm Hg during the tilt test). Six SIs were compared: SI1 (BP fall during phase 2), SI2 (BP recovery during phase 2), SI3 (the difference in BP between baseline and the end of phase 2), SI4 (the magnitude of phase 4), SI5 (BP recovery time), and SI6 (baroreflex sensitivity index).

resultsAll indexes showed overall significant differences among tested groups (p<0.05). Only SI3 differentiated all subject groups. Compared to other SIs, SI3 correlated the most with orthostatic hypotension (OH; r=0.62, p < 0.05) during the tilt.

conclusionsSI3 is the optimal method for calculation of SI since it 1) easily differentiates between healthy controls and those with SF; 2) correlates with the OH, a proxy for a sympathetic failure; 3) tracks the full spectrum of SF (mild-moderate-severe). SI3 expands the utility of quantitative autonomic testing.

Indexed as

AgedAutonomic Nervous System DiseasesBlood PressureFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSympathetic Nervous SystemValsalva ManeuverVasoconstriction

Identifiers

PMID21646629
PMCPMC3269073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.