Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21646355›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2011

Cell type-specific target selection by combinatorial binding of Smad2/3 proteins and hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha in HepG2 cells.

Anna Mizutani, Daizo Koinuma, Shuichi Tsutsumi, Naoko Kamimura, Masato Morikawa, Hiroshi I Suzuki, Takeshi Imamura, Kohei Miyazono, Hiroyuki Aburatani

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Inhibiting Yes-associated protein alleviates CClNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2024
    Article
  3. Analysis of the DNA-binding properties of TGF-β-activated Smad complexes unveils a possible molecular basis for cellular context-dependent signaling.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Transcriptional Control by the SMADs.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2016
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Crosstalk of HNF4Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna MizutaniDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Daizo Koinuma
Shuichi Tsutsumi
Naoko Kamimura
Masato Morikawa
Hiroshi I Suzuki
Takeshi Imamura
Kohei Miyazono
Hiroyuki Aburatani
The University of Tokyo · JPJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specific regulation of target genes by transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) in a given cellular context is determined in part by transcription factors and cofactors that interact with the Smad complex. In this study, we determined Smad2 and Smad3 (Smad2/3) binding regions in the promoters of known genes in HepG2 hepatoblastoma cells, and we compared them with those in HaCaT epidermal keratinocytes to elucidate the mechanisms of cell type- and context-dependent regulation of transcription induced by TGF-β. Our results show that 81% of the Smad2/3 binding regions in HepG2 cells were not shared with those found in HaCaT cells. Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α (HNF4α) is expressed in HepG2 cells but not in HaCaT cells, and the HNF4α-binding motif was identified as an enriched motif in the HepG2-specific Smad2/3 binding regions. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing analysis of HNF4α binding regions under TGF-β stimulation revealed that 32.5% of the Smad2/3 binding regions overlapped HNF4α bindings. MIXL1 was identified as a new combinatorial target of HNF4α and Smad2/3, and both the HNF4α protein and its binding motif were required for the induction of MIXL1 by TGF-β in HepG2 cells. These findings generalize the importance of binding of HNF4α on Smad2/3 binding genomic regions for HepG2-specific regulation of transcription by TGF-β and suggest that certain transcription factors expressed in a cell type-specific manner play important roles in the transcription regulated by the TGF-β-Smad signaling pathway.

Indexed as

Amino Acid MotifsHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4Hep G2 CellsHomeodomain ProteinsHumansOrgan SpecificityProtein BindingSmad2 ProteinSmad3 ProteinTransforming Growth Factor betaHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4HNF4A protein, humanHomeodomain ProteinsMIXL1 protein, humanSmad2 ProteinSMAD2 protein, humanSmad3 ProteinSMAD3 protein, humanTransforming Growth Factor beta

Identifiers

PMID21646355
PMCPMC3191026
OpenAlexW2034690180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.