Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21644062›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2011

Outcomes of switching anti-TNF drugs in rheumatoid arthritis--a study based on observational data from the Finnish Register of Biological Treatment (ROB-FIN).

Liisa M Virkki, Heikki Valleala, Yuya Takakubo, Jorma Vuotila, Heikki Relas, Riitta Komulainen, Riitta Koivuniemi, Urpo Yli-Kerttula, Markku Mali, Susanna Sihvonen and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Ozoralizumab, a Humanized Anti-TNFα NANOBODYFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cycling of tumor necrosis factor inhibitorsTherapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Liisa M VirkkiUniversity of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, Helsinki, Finland.
Heikki Valleala
Yuya Takakubo
Jorma Vuotila
Heikki Relas
Riitta Komulainen
Riitta Koivuniemi
Urpo Yli-Kerttula
Markku Mali
Susanna Sihvonen
Maija-Liisa Krogerus
Eero Jukka
Satu Nyrhinen
Yrjö T Konttinen
Dan C Nordström
Helsinki University Hospital · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FIInvalidisäätiö · FIKellokoski Hospital · FILapland Central Hospital · FINitte University · INReumasäätiön sairaala · FITampere University Hospital · FITurku University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess, based on observational data from the Finnish Register of Biological Treatment, the outcomes of switching an initial tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker to another in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RA patients, who started biological therapy with a TNF blocker between May 1999 and April 2009 and who switched to another TNF blocker, were studied (n=479). The outcomes were assessed according to the reason for and type of the switch. Outcome assessments included American College of Rheumatology 50 responder index (ACR50) response at 3 months after the switch, treatment duration of the second TNF blocker, and swollen joint counts, CRP and DAS28 score at the 3 months, best and last observations of the first and second TNF blocker, respectively. In those who switched due to lack of effectiveness (LOE), the disease activity parameters fell significantly from baseline upon use of infliximab or adalimumab, but had increased prior to the switch. Switching to another TNF blocker (etanercept or adalimumab) restored the response initially achieved with the first TNF blocker. The disease activity parameters fell significantly from baseline upon use of etanercept, and were maintained but not further improved after switching to adalimumab. TNF blocker switching seemed to be most beneficial in secondary LOE (defined as loss of ACR50 response). In those who switched due to adverse events (AE) or other reasons, a similar degree of response as had been achieved with the first agent was also achieved and maintained with the second agent. The results suggest that a second TNF blocker can restore the response in cases of secondary LOE and maintain it after switching due to an AE.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidEtanerceptFemaleFinlandHumansImmunoglobulin GInfliximabMaleAdalimumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsEtanerceptImmunoglobulin GInfliximabReceptors, Tumor Necrosis FactorTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID21644062
OpenAlexW1964449182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.