ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2012
Molecular modeling studies on phosphonic acid-containing thiazole derivatives: design for fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase inhibitors.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploration ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Toward the prediction of FBPase inhibitory activity using chemoinformatic methods.International journal of molecular sciences · 2012Article
- In silico identification of structure requirement for novel thiazole and oxazole derivatives as potent fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Presently, an in silico modeling was carried out on a series of 63 phosphonic acid-containing thiazole derivatives as fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase) inhibitors using CoMFA/CoMSIA and molecular docking methods. The CoMFA and CoMSIA models using 51 molecules in the training set gave r (cv) (2) values of 0.675 and 0.619, r ( 2 ) values of 0.985 and 0.979, respectively. The systemic external validation indicated that our CoMFA and CoMSIA models possessed high predictive powers with r (0) (2) values of 0.995 and 0.994, r (m(test)) (2) values of 0.887 and 0.860, respectively. The 3D contour maps of the CoMFA and CoMSIA provided smooth and interpretable explanation of the structure-activity relationship for the inhibitors. Molecular docking studies revealed that a phosphonic group was essential for binding to the AMP binding site, and some key features were also identified. The analyses of the 3D contour plots and molecular docking results permitted interesting conclusions about the effects of different substituent groups at different positions of the common scaffold, which might guide the design of novel FBPase inhibitors with higher activity and bioavailability. A set of 60 new analogues were designed by utilizing the results revealed in the present study, and were predicted with significantly improved potencies in the developed models. The findings can be quite useful to aid the designing of new fructose-1,6-biphophatase inhibitors with improved biological response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21644014What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.