Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21643985›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2011

IDH mutation status impact on in vivo hypoxia biomarkers expression: new insights from a clinical, nuclear imaging and immunohistochemical study in 33 glioma patients.

Philippe Metellus, Carole Colin, David Taieb, Eric Guedj, Isabelle Nanni-Metellus, Andre Maues de Paula, Cécile Colavolpe, Stephane Fuentes, Henry Dufour, Marylin Barrie and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Metabolomics of Glioma.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Formation of new lymphatic vessels in glioma: An immunohistochemical analysis.Neuropathology : official journal of the Japanese Society of Neuropathology · 2020
    Article
  12. Radiogenomics Based on PET Imaging.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Review
  13. Consequences ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. A highThe British journal of radiology · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The Evolving Role of Succinate in Tumor Metabolism: AnJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Philippe MetellusHôpital de la Timone, Service de Neurochirurgie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13000 Marseille, France. philippe.metellus@mail.ap-hm.fr
Carole Colin
David Taieb
Eric Guedj
Isabelle Nanni-Metellus
Andre Maues de Paula
Cécile Colavolpe
Stephane Fuentes
Henry Dufour
Marylin Barrie
Olivier Chinot
L'houcine Ouafik
Dominique Figarella-Branger
Hôpital de la Timone · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations in the gene encoding isocitrate dehydrogenase enzyme isoforms 1 (IDH1) and 2 (IDH2) have recently been identified in a large proportion of glial tumors of the CNS, but their mechanistic role in tumor development remains unclear. Here, we assessed the actual impact of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in patients harboring WHO grade II and III gliomas. We sequenced IDH1 at codon 132 and IDH2 at codon 172 in 33 patients with WHO grade II and III gliomas who benefited from a preoperative (18)F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET). Immunohistochemical expression of Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1alpha (HIF-1α), Carbonic Anhydrase IX (CAIX), Glucose Transporter 1 (GLUT1) and Caspase 3 active form (CASP3) along with the R132HIDH1 mutation was assessed in all cases as well as 1p/19q deletion status and p53 expression. HIF-1α expression was found in 15% of IDH-mutated compared to 7.7% of IDH-nonmutated tumors (P = 0.954). Also, GLUT-1 positive staining was found in 5% of IDH-mutated and in 7.1% of IDH-nonmutated tumors (P = 0.794). Finally, CA-IX expression was found in 15% of IDH-mutated and in 7.7% of IDH-nonmutated tumors (P = 0.484). The combined expression of these three hypoxic markers was found in two WHO grade III tumors, one of which was IDH-mutated whereas the other was IDH-nonmutated (P = 0.794). In IDH-mutated tumors, the median SUVmax ratio was 2.24 versus 2.15 in IDH-nonmutated tumors (P = 0.775). Together, these data question the actual relationship between IDH mutation status and in vivo hypoxic biomarkers expression in WHO grade II and III gliomas.

Indexed as

MutationAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGliomaHumansHypoxiaImmunohistochemistryIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyBiomarkers, TumorIDH1 protein, humanIDH2 protein, humanIsocitrate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID21643985
OpenAlexW1998391025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.