Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21643932›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2011

Cytogenetic analysis of a malignant triton tumour by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and review of the literature.

Dimitrios Koutsimpelas, Jürgen Brieger, Ulf Heinrich, Michael Torzewski, Clemens Sommer, Wolf J Mann

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dimitrios KoutsimpelasDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany. koutsimpelas@hno.klinik.uni-mainz.de
Jürgen Brieger
Ulf Heinrich
Michael Torzewski
Clemens Sommer
Wolf J Mann
University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant triton tumour (MTT) is a rare, highly malignant neoplasm, characterized by a mixture of cells with nerve sheath and skeletal muscle differentiation. Cytogenetic analyses of this neoplasm are rare to date and none comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) analysis has been published. In the present study we report about the genomic imbalances of a MMT analysed by CGH, in a 39-year-old male patient without neurofibromatosis. We observed the amplifications at chromosomal location 1p, 6p, 16p, 16q, 17p, 17q, 19p, 19q, 20p, and 22q. Comparing our results with those of previous studies, we found evidence for recurrent genomic aberrations at the chromosomes 1, 16, 17, 19, and 22 suggesting the involvement of several oncogenes in the genesis of MTT.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsAdultBiopsy, NeedleCombined Modality TherapyComparative Genomic HybridizationCytogenetic AnalysisDisease ProgressionFatal OutcomeHumansImmunohistochemistryMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingNeuroma, AcousticNeurosurgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID21643932
OpenAlexW2069703634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.