ArticleSurgical endoscopy2011
Endoscopic assessment of failed fundoplication: a case for standardization.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- ACG Clinical Guidelines: Clinical Use of Esophageal Physiologic Testing.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2020Guideline
- Diagnostic Accuracy of High-Resolution Manometry for Assessing Fundoplication Integrity: Validation of the Padova Classification.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Article
- Endoscopic assessment of failed fundoplications differs between endoscopists.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Secondary peristalsis and esophagogastric junction distensibility in symptomatic post-fundoplication patients.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2024Article
- Assessment of laparoscopic fundoplication with endoscopy: room for improvement.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Variability in endoscopic assessment of Nissen fundoplication wrap integrity and hiatus herniation.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2022Article
- ENDOSCOPIC EVALUATION OF POST-FUNDOPLICATION ANATOMY AND CORRELATION WITH SYMPTOMATOLOGY.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2021Article
- Screening for Barrett's Oesophagus: Are We Ready for it?Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2021Review
- High Resolution Manometry Guidance During Laparoscopic Fundoplication in Pediatric Surgically "Fragile" Patients: Preliminary Report.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Real-time MRI for the dynamic assessment of fundoplication failure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.European radiology · 2019Article
- Point-Counterpoint: Screening and Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus, Is It Worthwhile?Digestive diseases and sciences · 2018Review
- Endoscopic Evaluation of Post-Fundoplication Anatomy.Current gastroenterology reports · 2017Review
- MRI patterns of Nissen fundoplication: normal appearance and mechanisms of failure.European radiology · 2014Article
- A proposed classification for uniform endoscopic description of surgical fundoplication.Surgical endoscopy · 2014Article
- High-resolution manometry patterns of lower esophageal sphincter complex in symptomatic post-fundoplication patients.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreoperative endoscopic assessment of the failed fundoplication is instrumental in diagnosis and surgical management. Endoscopy is a routine and essential part of the workup for a failed fundoplication, but no clear guidelines exist for reporting endoscopic findings. This study aimed to compare endoscopic findings reported by community physicians (gastroenterologists and surgeons) with the findings of the authors (esophageal center) for patients who underwent reoperative intervention after a previous antireflux procedure.
methodsRetrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients who underwent reoperation after a failed antireflux operation between 1 December 2003 and 30 June 2010. Endoscopic findings as reported by the outside physician and by the esophageal center endoscopist were reviewed and compared.
resultsDuring the study period, 229 patients underwent reoperation. Of these patients, 20 did not have endoscopy performed by an outside physician and were excluded from the study, leaving 208 patients. The endoscopic reports of the esophageal center physician included 97 cases of hiatal hernia (64 type 1 and 33 types 2 and 3), 52 slipped fundoplications, 61 disrupted fundoplications, 30 intrathoracic fundoplications, 25 twisted fundoplications, 14 two-compartment stomachs, and 27 cases of Barrett's esophagus. Outside physicians identified 68% of the hiatal hernias and 61% of the paraesophageal hernias reported by the authors. Only 32% of the outside reports mentioned a previous fundoplication. Furthermore, only 17% of the slipped fundoplications and 30% of the disrupted fundoplications were so described. Outside physicians identified 19 of the 27 patients with Barrett's esophagus.
conclusionFundoplication changes described by the general endoscopist are inadequate. With an increasing population of patients who have undergone prior antireflux surgery, incorporation of fundoplication assessment in an endoscopic curriculum may be helpful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.