Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21643686›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2011

Update: schizophrenia across cultures.

Neely Laurenzo Myers

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Resignation Syndrome: Catatonia? Culture-Bound?Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Neely Laurenzo MyersCenter for the Study of Complementary and Alternative Therapies, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. neelymyers@gmail.com

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN COMPLEMENTARY &ALTERNATIVE MEDICINET32AT000052 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI TAYLOR, ANN GILL · 2000 to 2010
$3.6M
NCCIH NIH HHS 5-T32-AT000052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of schizophrenia, as well as the symptoms, course, and outcomes for people so diagnosed seem to vary across some cultural contexts. The mechanisms by which cultural variations may protect one from or increase one's risk of developing schizophrenia remain unclear. Recent findings from transdisciplinary cross-cultural research, indicate ways that we may better understand how socioenvironmental and cultural variables interact with physiologic pathways relating psychosocial stress and psychotic symptoms, epigenetic changes, and people's use of culturally available tools to mitigate stress, in ways that may inform relevant, effective interventions for people diagnosed with psychotic disorders worldwide.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonCultureFamilyHumansPsychologyRisk FactorsSchizophreniaSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.