Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21643583›Full record

ReviewPhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP2011

Coarse-grained force field: general folding theory.

Adam Liwo, Yi He, Harold A Scheraga

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Decoding Solubility Signatures from Amyloid Monomer Energy Landscapes.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  2. Bottom-up Coarse-Graining: Principles and Perspectives.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The power of coarse graining in biomolecular simulations.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular science · 2014
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adam LiwoFaculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, ul. Sobieskiego 18, 80-952 Gdansk, Poland.
Yi He
Harold A Scheraga

Funding

INTERNAL BONDIN IN PROTEINSR01GM014312 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI MAISURADZE, GIA, RACKOVSKY, SHALOM R · 1985 to 2021
$9.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-14312NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM014312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We review the coarse-grained UNited RESidue (UNRES) force field for the simulations of protein structure and dynamics, which is being developed in our laboratory over the last several years. UNRES is a physics-based force field, the prototype of which is defined as a potential of mean force of polypeptide chains in water, where all the degrees of freedom except the coordinates of α-carbon atoms and side-chain centers have been integrated out. We describe the initial implementation of UNRES to protein-structure prediction formulated as a search for the global minimum of the potential-energy function and its subsequent molecular dynamics and extensions of molecular-dynamics implementation, which enabled us to study protein-folding pathways and thermodynamics, as well as to reformulate the protein-structure prediction problem as a search for the conformational ensemble with the lowest free energy at temperatures below the folding-transition temperature. Applications of UNRES to study biological problems are also described.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationProtein FoldingAnimalsHumansProtein ConformationProteinsThermodynamicsProteins

Identifiers

PMID21643583
PMCPMC3362049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.