Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21643490›Full record

ArticleCrystal growth & design2011

What's in a drop? Correlating observations and outcomes to guide macromolecular crystallization experiments.

Joseph R Luft, Jennifer R Wolfley, Edward H Snell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crystal growth & design, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Phase Separation and Aggregation of α-Synuclein Diverge at Different Salt Conditions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Macromolecular crystallography using microcrystal electron diffraction.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021
    Review
  13. Cinder: keeping crystallographers app-y.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Computational crystallization.Archives of biochemistry and biophysics · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Analysis of crystallization data in the Protein Data Bank.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joseph R LuftHauptman-Woodward Medical Research Institute, 700 Ellicott St., Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.
Jennifer R Wolfley
Edward H Snell

Funding

TOOLS FOR HIGH THROUGHPUT STRUCTURAL BIOLOGYU54GM074899 · NIGMS · HAUPTMAN-WOODWARD MEDICAL RESEARCH INST · PI DETITTA, GEORGE T · 2005 to 2010
$16.5M
Enabling Technologies to Macromolecular CrystallizationR01GM100494 · NIGMS · HAUPTMAN-WOODWARD MEDICAL RESEARCH INST · PI LUFT, JOSEPH · 2011 to 2014
$1.9M
Development of an Expert Crystallization Knowledge SystemR01GM088396 · NIGMS · HAUPTMAN-WOODWARD MEDICAL RESEARCH INST · PI SNELL, EDWARD H · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088396NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100494NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM074899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observations of crystallization experiments are classified as specific outcomes and integrated through a phase diagram to visualize solubility and thereby direct subsequent experiments. Specific examples are taken from our high-throughput crystallization laboratory which provided a broad scope of data from 20 million crystallization experiments on 12,500 different biological macromolecules. The methods and rationale are broadly and generally applicable in any crystallization laboratory. Through a combination of incomplete factorial sampling of crystallization cocktails, standard outcome classifications, visualization of outcomes as they relate chemically and application of a simple phase diagram approach we demonstrate how to logically design subsequent crystallization experiments.

Identifiers

PMID21643490
PMCPMC3106348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.