Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21642453›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2011

Identification of an anchor residue for CheA-CheY interactions in the chemotaxis system of Escherichia coli.

Hemang Thakor, Sarah Nicholas, Ian M Porter, Nicole Hand, Richard C Stewart

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The Divergent Key Residues of TwoMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Robust signal processing in living cells.PLoS computational biology · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hemang ThakorDepartment of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Sarah Nicholas
Ian M Porter
Nicole Hand
Richard C Stewart
University of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION MECHANISMS IN BACTERIAL CHEMOTAXISR01GM052853 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI STEWART, RICHARD C. · 1995 to 2009
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM052853NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM052853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transfer of a phosphoryl group from autophosphorylated CheA (P-CheA) to CheY is an important step in the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway. This reaction involves CheY (i) binding to the P2 domain of P-CheA and then (ii) acquiring the phosphoryl group from the P1 domain. Crystal structures indicated numerous side chain interactions at the CheY-P2 binding interface. To investigate the individual contributions of the P2 side chains involved in these contacts, we analyzed the effects of eight alanine substitution mutations on CheA-CheY binding interactions. An F214A substitution in P2 caused ∼1,000-fold reduction in CheA-CheY binding affinity, while Ala substitutions at other P2 positions had small effects (E171A, E178A, and I216A) or no detectable effects (H181A, D202A, D207A, and C213A) on binding affinity. These results are discussed in relation to previous in silico predictions of hot-spot and anchor positions at the CheA-CheY interface. We also investigated the consequences of these mutations for chemotaxis signal transduction in living cells. CheA(F214A) was defective in mediating localization of CheY-YFP to the large clusters of signaling proteins that form at the poles of Escherichia coli cells, while the other CheA variants did not differ from wild-type (wt) CheA (CheA(wt)) in this regard. In our set of mutants, only CheA(F214A) exhibited a markedly diminished ability to support chemotaxis in motility agar assays. Surprisingly, however, in FRET assays that monitored receptor-regulated production of phospho-CheY, CheA(F214A) (and each of the other Ala substitution mutants) performed just as well as CheA(wt). Overall, our findings indicate that F214 serves as an anchor residue at the CheA-CheY interface and makes an important contribution to the binding energy in vitro and in vivo; however, loss of this contribution does not have a large negative effect on the overall ability of the signaling pathway to modulate P-CheY levels in response to chemoattractants.

Indexed as

ChemotaxisAmino Acid MotifsBacterial ProteinsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsHistidine KinaseMembrane ProteinsMethyl-Accepting Chemotaxis ProteinsProtein BindingBacterial ProteinscheA protein, E colicheY protein, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsHistidine KinaseMembrane ProteinsMethyl-Accepting Chemotaxis Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21642453
PMCPMC3147499
OpenAlexW2158258765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.