ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2011
Potentially human-pathogenic Escherichia coli O26 in Norwegian sheep flocks.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clonal spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in a region, China.BMC microbiology · 2022Article
- Prevalence and Whole-Genome Sequence-Based Analysis of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Isolates from the Recto-Anal Junction of Slaughter-Age Irish Sheep.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2021Article
- Molecular characterization of enterohemorrhagicVeterinary world · 2021Article
- Multilocus Variable-Number Tandem-Repeat Analysis for Geno-typing ofIranian journal of public health · 2020Article
- Captive wildlife from India as carriers of Shiga toxin-producing, Enteropathogenic and Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2019Article
- Escherichia coli O104 in Feedlot Cattle Feces: Prevalence, Isolation and Characterization.PloS one · 2016Article
- Potentially pathogenic Escherichia coli can form a biofilm under conditions relevant to the food production chain.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2014Article
- Occurrence of potentially human-pathogenic Escherichia coli O103 in Norwegian sheep.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2013Article
- Recent advances in understanding enteric pathogenic Escherichia coli.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2013Review
- Scientific Opinion on the public health hazards to be covered by inspection of meat from sheep and goats.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2013Article
- Detection of Escherichia coli O104 in the feces of feedlot cattle by a multiplex PCR assay designed to target major genetic traits of the virulent hybrid strain responsible for the 2011 German outbreak.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2013Article
- Host-Microbe Interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans.ISRN microbiology · 2013Article
- Norwegian sheep are an important reservoir for human-pathogenic Escherichia coli O26:H11.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2012Article
- Zoonotic agents in small ruminants kept on city farms in southern Germany.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A national survey of Escherichia coli O26 in Norwegian sheep flocks was conducted, using fecal samples to determine the prevalence. In total, 491 flocks were tested, and E. coli O26 was detected in 17.9% of the flocks. One hundred forty-two E. coli O26 isolates were examined for flagellar antigens (H typing) and four virulence genes, including stx and eae, to identify possible Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) and enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC). Most isolates (129 out of 142) were identified as E. coli O26:H11. They possessed eae and may have potential as human pathogens, although only a small fraction were identified as STEC O26:H11, giving a prevalence in sheep flocks of only 0.8%. Correspondingly, the sheep flock prevalence of atypical EPEC (aEPEC) O26:H11 was surprisingly high (15.9%). The genetic relationship between the E. coli O26:H11 isolates was investigated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA), identifying 63 distinct PFGE profiles and 22 MLVA profiles. Although the MLVA protocol was less discriminatory than PFGE and a few cases of disagreement were observed, comparison by partition mapping showed an overall good accordance between the two methods. A close relationship between a few isolates of aEPEC O26:H11 and STEC O26:H11 was identified, but all the E. coli O26:H11 isolates should be considered potentially pathogenic to humans. The present study consisted of a representative sampling of sheep flocks from all parts of Norway. This is the first large survey of sheep flocks focusing on E. coli O26 in general, including results of STEC, aEPEC, and nonpathogenic isolates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.