ArticleAtencion primaria2012
[Distribution of primary care expenditure according to sex and age group: a retrospective analysis].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationship of frailty status with health resource use and healthcare costs in the population aged 65 and over in Catalonia.European journal of ageing · 2023Article
- Influence of a Virtual Exercise Program throughout Pregnancy during the COVID-19 Pandemic on Perineal Tears and Episiotomy Rates: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Socioeconomic and Lifestyle Factors Related to Cost and Frequency of Hospitalization in European Older Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Relationship between efficiency and clinical effectiveness indicators in an adjusted model of resource consumption: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study the primary care expenditure per person and the weight of different health resources within sex and age groups.
designCost analysis. Retrospective descriptive study.
setting14 urban primary care centers (assigned population: 313,000).
participantsAll patients who visited during 2008 (227,235). STUDY PERIOD: January to December 2008. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Age, sex, visits, laboratory, radiology and complementary tests and referrals to specialists were obtained from patient electronic files. Pharmacy expenditure was obtained from invoices sent to the national health system by pharmacists. Fixed/semi-fixed costs were distributed among visits and a mean cost/visit was obtained. Costs were assigned for laboratory (mean application cost), for radiology and complementary tests (rate per type of test) and for referrals (adjusted rate). Descriptive analysis of data (median, interquartile range and coefficient of variance).
resultsMedian expenditure was 362 € (321 € for men and 396 € for women). For the up to 2 year-old group it was 410 €, for aged 15-44 203 € and 75 and above 1,255 €.). The up to 2 years old visits represented 81% of total cost while pharmacy was 8%, while for those aged 75 and above visits accounted for 21% of the total cost and pharmacy 63%.
conclusionsExpenditure in primary care is higher in women, although the greatest differences were observed with age. In older than 74 years the median expenditure was six-fold higher than that for 3-44 years old group. In pediatrics the main source of expenditure was visits, representing 80% of the total in up to 2 years old. From 45 years old, pharmacy was the main source of expenditure and in those older than 74 it represented over 60% of the total.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.