Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21640906›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2011

KNL1/Spc105 recruits PP1 to silence the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Jessica S Rosenberg, Frederick R Cross, Hironori Funabiki

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 225 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Science advances · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. A coadapted KNL1 and spindle assembly checkpoint axis orchestrates precise mitosis in Arabidopsis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Principles and dynamics of spindle assembly checkpoint signalling.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica S RosenbergLaboratory of Chromosome and Cell Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Frederick R Cross
Hironori Funabiki
Rockefeller University · US

Funding

Roles of Chromosomal Factors in Chromosome SegregationR01GM075249 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI FUNABIKI, HIRONORI · 2005 to 2018
$4.5M
SPECIFICITY OF CYCLIN FUNCTION AT CELL CYCLE INITIATIONR01GM047238 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI CROSS, FREDERICK R. · 1993 to 2010
$3.4M
Sources and Consequences of noise in cell cycle regulationR01GM078153 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI CROSS, FREDERICK R. · 2006 to 2019
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM47238NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM047238NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM075249NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays anaphase onset until kinetochores accomplish bioriented microtubule attachments [1]. Although several centromeric and kinetochore kinases, including Aurora B, regulate kinetochore-microtubule attachment and/or SAC activation [2-4], the molecular mechanism that translates bioriented attachment into SAC silencing remains unclear [5]. Employing a method to rapidly induce exact gene replacement in budding yeast [6], we show here that the binding of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1/Glc7) to the evolutionarily conserved RVSF motif of the kinetochore protein Spc105 (KNL1/Blinkin/CASC5) is essential for viability by silencing the SAC, while it plays an auxiliary nonessential role for physical chromosome segregation. Although Aurora B may inhibit this binding, persistent PP1-Spc105 interaction does not affect chromosome segregation and is insufficient to silence the SAC in the absence of microtubules, indicating that dynamic regulation of this interaction is dispensable. However, the amount of PP1 targeted to kinetochores must be finely tuned, because recruitment of either no or one extra copy of PP1 to Spc105 is detrimental, illustrating the vital impact of targeting an exiguous fraction of PP1 to the kinetochore. We propose that the PP1-Spc105 interaction enables local regulation of dynamic phosphorylation and dephosphorylation at the kinetochore to couple microtubule attachment and SAC silencing.

Indexed as

AnaphaseConserved SequenceGenotypeKinetochoresMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMitosisMutagenesis, Site-DirectedPhosphorylationProtein Phosphatase 1Protein Structure, TertiarySaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSpindle ApparatusGLC7 protein, S cerevisiaeMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsProtein Phosphatase 1Saccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSpc105 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID21640906
PMCPMC3109435
OpenAlexW1978668011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.