Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21640163›Full record

ArticleBiochimica et biophysica acta2012

S-nitrosylation in the regulation of gene transcription.

Yonggang Sha, Harvey E Marshall

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Role of CaMediators of inflammation · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. NOS2 andProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Proteomic Analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Micro RNAs in Regulation of Cellular Redox Homeostasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yonggang ShaDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Harvey E Marshall
Duke University · US

Funding

S-nitrosothiols, NF-KappaB and Inflammation in Acute Lung InjuryR01HL092994 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MARSHALL, HARVEY E · 2009 to 2017
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL092994NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL092994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-translational modification of proteins by S-nitrosylation serves as a major mode of signaling in mammalian cells and a growing body of evidence has shown that transcription factors and their activating pathways are primary targets. S-nitrosylation directly modifies a number of transcription factors, including NF-κB, HIF-1, and AP-1. In addition, S-nitrosylation can indirectly regulate gene transcription by modulating other cell signaling pathways, in particular JNK kinase and ras. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The evolution of S-nitrosylation as a signaling mechanism in the regulation of gene transcription, physiological advantages of protein S-nitrosylation in the control of gene transcription, and discussion of the many transcriptional proteins modulated by S-nitrosylation is summarized. MAJOR

conclusionsS-nitrosylation plays a crucial role in the control of mammalian gene transcription with numerous transcription factors regulated by this modification. Many of these proteins serve as immunomodulators, and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) is regarded as a principal mediatiator of NO-dependent S-nitrosylation. However, additional targets within the nucleus (e.g. histone deacetylases) and alternative mechanisms of S-nitrosylation (e.g. GAPDH-mediated trans-nitrosylation) are thought to play a role in NOS-dependent transcriptional regulation. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: Derangement of SNO-regulated gene transcription is an important factor in a variety of pathological conditions including neoplasia and sepsis. A better understanding of protein S-nitrosylation as it relates to gene transcription and the physiological mechanisms behind this process is likely to lead to novel therapies for these disorders. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Regulation of Cellular Processes by S-nitrosylation.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticAnimalsEscherichia coliGene Expression RegulationHumansHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitNF-kappa BNitric OxideNitric Oxide Synthase Type IINitrosationProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalSalmonellaSignal TransductionTranscription Factor AP-1Transcription FactorsHIF1A protein, humanHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitNF-kappa BNitric OxideNitric Oxide Synthase Type IITranscription Factor AP-1Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21640163
PMCPMC4403761
OpenAlexW2044781509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.