Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21639876›Full record

Trial reportBMC women's health2011

Protocol for translabial 3D-ultrasonography for diagnosing levator defects (TRUDIL): a multicentre cohort study for estimating the diagnostic accuracy of translabial 3D-ultrasonography of the pelvic floor as compared to MR imaging.

Kim J B Notten, Mirjam Weemhoff, Kirsten B Kluivers, Karlijn J Schweitzer, Femke Mulder, Jaap Stoker, Regina G H Beets-Tan, Jurgen J Futterer, Roy F A Vliegen, Johannes L H Evers and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC women's health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Technique of anterior colporrhaphy: a Dutch evaluation.International urogynecology journal · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Kim J B NottenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, The Netherlands. kim.notten@mumc.nl
Mirjam Weemhoff
Kirsten B Kluivers
Karlijn J Schweitzer
Femke Mulder
Jaap Stoker
Regina G H Beets-Tan
Jurgen J Futterer
Roy F A Vliegen
Johannes L H Evers
Gerold Link
Martin G M Bergmans
Paul H N M Kampschöer
Ed T C M Gondrie
Iris van Gestel
Ivo van Dooren
Carmen Dirksen
Luc J M Smits
Patrick M Bossuyt
Jan Paul W R Roovers
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLAtrium Medisch Centrum Parkstad · NLLaurentius Ziekenhuis · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSt.Jans Gasthuis Weert · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLVieCuri Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a condition affecting more than half of the women above age 40. The estimated lifetime risk of needing surgical management for POP is 11%. In patients undergoing POP surgery of the anterior vaginal wall, the re-operation rate is 30%. The recurrence risk is especially high in women with a levator ani defect. Such defect is present if there is a partially or completely detachment of the levator ani from the inferior ramus of the symphysis. Detecting levator ani defects is relevant for counseling, and probably also for treatment. Levator ani defects can be imaged with MRI and also with Translabial 3D ultrasonography of the pelvic floor. The primary aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of translabial 3D ultrasonography for diagnosing levator defects in women with POP with Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the reference standard. Secondary goals of this study include quantification of the inter-observer agreement about levator ani defects and determining the association between levator defects and recurrent POP after anterior repair. In addition, the cost-effectiveness of adding translabial ultrasonography to the diagnostic work-up in patients with POP will be estimated in a decision analytic model. METHODS/

designA multicentre cohort study will be performed in nine Dutch hospitals. 140 consecutive women with a POPQ stage 2 or more anterior vaginal wall prolapse, who are indicated for anterior colporapphy will be included. Patients undergoing additional prolapse procedures will also be included. Prior to surgery, patients will undergo MR imaging and translabial 3D ultrasound examination of the pelvic floor. Patients will be asked to complete validated disease specific quality of life questionnaires before surgery and at six and twelve months after surgery. Pelvic examination will be performed at the same time points. Assuming a sensitivity and specificity of 90% of 3D ultrasound for diagnosing levator defects in a population of 120 women with POP, with a prior probability of levator ani defects of 40%, we will be able to estimate predictive values with good accuracy (i.e. confidence limits of at most 10% below or above the point estimates of positive and negative predictive values).Anticipating 3% unclassifiable diagnostic images because of technical reasons, and a further safety margin of 10% we plan to recruit 140 patients.

trial registrationNederlands trial register NTR2220.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMuscle, SkeletalMuscular DiseasesObserver VariationPelvic FloorPelvic Organ ProlapseRecurrenceSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID21639876
PMCPMC3121676
OpenAlexW2145167318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.