ReviewAnnual review of nursing research2010
Standardized nursing languages: essential for the nursing workforce.
Review in Annual review of nursing research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Interventions to optimise nutrition in older people in hospitals and long-term care: Umbrella review.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Quality and extent of implementation of a nurse-led care management intervention: care coordination for health promotion and activities in Parkinson's disease (CHAPS).BMC health services research · 2020Trial
- When Care Does Not Count: Epistemic Injustice and the Organisational Recognition of Nursing Knowledge.Nursing inquiry · 2026Article
- How Scientific Is Nursing? Answers From A New Characterization of Science.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2026Article
- Postoperative structured nursing plan for patients with cervical spine fracture and spinal cord injury: a retrospective study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Review
- Standardized Nursing Terminologies and Electronic Health Records: A Secondary Analysis of a Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Definition and Classification of Dental Hygiene Interventions Based on the Dental Hygiene Process of Care: A Delphi Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Transition to a new nursing information system embedded with clinical decision support: a mixed-method study using the HOT-fit framework.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Developing a nursing diagnosis for the risk for malnutrition: a mixed-method study.Nursing open · 2021Article
- Measuring the effects of guided clinical reasoning on the Advanced Nursing Process quality, on nurses' knowledge and attitude: Study protocol.Nursing open · 2019Article
- Monitoring progression of clinical reasoning skills during health sciences education using the case method - a qualitative observational study.BMC medical education · 2017Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The evolution of standardized nursing languages (SNLs) has been occurring for more than four decades. The importance of this work continues to be acknowledged as an effective strategy to delineate professional nursing practice. In today's health care environment, the demand to deliver cost-effective, safe, quality patient care is an essential mandate embedded in all health reform policies. Communicating the contributions of professional nursing practice to other nurses, health providers, and other members of the health care team requires the articulation of nursing's focus of concern and responses to these concerns to improve patient outcomes. The visibility of the electronic health record (EHR) in practice settings has accelerated the need for nursing to communicate its practice within the structure of the electronic format. The integration of SNLs into the patient record offers nurses an opportunity to describe the focus of their practice through the identification of nursing diagnosis, interventions and outcomes (IOM, 2010). Continued development, testing, and refinement of SNLs offers nursing an accurate and reliable way to use data elements across populations and settings to communicate nursing practice, enable nursing administrators and leaders in health care to delineate needed resources, cost out nursing care with greater precision, and design new models of care that reflect nurse-patient ratios and patient acuity that are data driven (Pesut & Herman, 1998). The continued use of nursing languages and acceleration of nursing research using this data can provide the needed evidence to help link nursing knowledge to evidence-driven, cost-effective, quality outcomes that more accurately reflect nursing's impact on patient care as well as the health care system of which they are a part. The evaluation of research to support the development, use, and continued refinement of nursing language is critical to research and the transformation of patient care by nurses on a global level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.