ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2011
Characterisation of unclassified variants in the BRCA1/2 genes with a putative effect on splicing.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional characterization of BRCA1 variants of unknown significance using homologous recombination repair assays.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Synonymous Variants: Necessary Nuance in Our Understanding of Cancer Drivers and Treatment Outcomes.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022Review
- Interpretation of BRCA2 Splicing Variants: A Case Series of Challenging Variant Interpretations and the Importance of Functional RNA Analysis.Familial cancer · 2022Article
- Pathogenic neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) RNA splicing resolved by targeted RNAseq.NPJ genomic medicine · 2021Article
- Systematic misclassification of missense variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 "coldspots".Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020Article
- The Missing "lnc" between Genetics and Cardiac Disease.Non-coding RNA · 2020Article
- Massive computational identification of somatic variants in exonic splicing enhancers using The Cancer Genome Atlas.Cancer medicine · 2019Article
- Targeted RNA-seq successfully identifies normal and pathogenic splicing events in breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility and Lynch syndrome genes.International journal of cancer · 2019Article
- BRCA1-No Matter How You Splice It.Cancer research · 2019Review
- Next-Generation Sequencing in Oncology: Genetic Diagnosis, Risk Prediction and Cancer Classification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Review
- Adding In Silico Assessment of Potential Splice Aberration to the Integrated Evaluation of BRCA Gene Unclassified Variants.Human mutation · 2016Article
- BRCA1 EXON 11, a CERES (composite regulatory element of splicing) element involved in splice regulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2014Article
- Article
- A guide for functional analysis of BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance.Human mutation · 2012Review
- Detection of exon skipping events in BRCA1 RNA using MLPA kit P002.Molecular biology reports · 2012Article
- Comprehensive splicing functional analysis of DNA variants of the BRCA2 gene by hybrid minigenes.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2012Article
- Article
- BRCA1 c.4987-3C>G is a pathogenic mutation.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A subset of the unclassified variants (UVs) identified during genetic screening of BRCA1/2 genes may affect splicing. We assessed at RNA level the effect of four BRCA1 and ten BRCA2 UVs with a putative splice effect, as predicted in silico. The variants selected for this study were beyond the positions -1, -2 or +1, +2 from the exon, and were not previously described (n = 8) or their effect on splicing was not assessed previously (n = 6). Lymphocytes from UV carriers and healthy controls were cultured and treated with puromycin to prevent nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. The relative contribution of each allele to the various transcripts was assessed using combinations of allele-specific and transcript-specific primers. BRCA2 c.425G>T, c.7976+3_7976+4del and c.8754+3G>C give rise to aberrant transcripts BRCA2Δ4, BRCA2Δ17 and retention of 46nt of intron 21, respectively, and were considered pathogenic. BRCA1 c.4987-3C>G gives rise to BRCA1Δ17 that is likely pathogenic; however, residual expression of the full-length transcript from the variant allele could not be excluded. BRCA1 c.692C>T, c.693G>A and BRCA2 c.6935A>T, besides expressing the full-length transcript, increased expression of BRCA1Δ11 and BRCA2Δ12, respectively. As these are naturally occurring isoforms, also observed in controls, the clinical relevance is unclear. The seven remaining UVs did not affect splicing and three intronic variants were therefore classified as neutral. In conclusion, the RNA analysis results clarified the clinical relevance of 6 of the 14 studied UVs and thereby greatly improve the genetic counselling of high-risk breast/ovarian cancer patients carrying these classified variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21638052What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.