Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21637956›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2012

Mitochondrial DNA variation in natural populations of endangered Indian feather-back fish, Chitala chitala.

Anup Mandal, Vindhya Mohindra, Rajeev Kumar Singh, Peyush Punia, Ajay Kumar Singh, Kuldeep Kumar Lal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Panmictic stock structure of milkfish (Journal of genetics · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Shallow population structure of southern bluefin tuna,Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anup MandalNational Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Canal Ring Road, PO Dilkusha, Lucknow, 226002 UP, India.
Vindhya Mohindra
Rajeev Kumar Singh
Peyush Punia
Ajay Kumar Singh
Kuldeep Kumar Lal
National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic variation at mitochondrial cytochrome b (cyt b) and D-loop region reveals the evidence of population sub-structuring in Indian populations of highly endangered primitive feather-back fish Chitala chitala. Samples collected through commercial catches from eight riverine populations from different geographical locations of India were analyzed for cyt b region (307 bp) and D-loop region (636-716 bp). The sequences of the both the mitochondrial regions revealed high haplotype diversity and low nucleotide diversity. The patterns of genetic diversity, haplotypes networks clearly indicated two distinct mitochondrial lineages and mismatch distribution strongly suggest a historical influence on the genetic structure of C. chitala populations. The baseline information on genetic variation and the evidence of population sub-structuring generated from this study would be useful for planning effective strategies for conservation and rehabilitation of this highly endangered species.

Indexed as

Endangered SpeciesGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationAnimalsBase SequenceCluster AnalysisConservation of Natural ResourcesCytochromes bDNA, MitochondrialFishesGeographyHaplotypesIndiaMolecular Sequence DataPhylogeographySequence AlignmentCytochromes bDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID21637956
OpenAlexW2096465845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.