Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21637760›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Monitoring of in vivo function of superparamagnetic iron oxide labelled murine dendritic cells during anti-tumour vaccination.

Richard Tavaré, Pervinder Sagoo, Gopal Varama, Yakup Tanriver, Alice Warely, Sandra S Diebold, Richard Southworth, Tobias Schaeffter, Robert I Lechler, Reza Razavi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Non-radioactive imaging strategies forPhysical sciences reviews · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. [(89)Zr]oxinate4 for long-term in vivo cell tracking by positron emission tomography.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Richard TavaréDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Department of Imaging Chemistry and Biology, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Pervinder Sagoo
Gopal Varama
Yakup Tanriver
Alice Warely
Sandra S Diebold
Richard Southworth
Tobias Schaeffter
Robert I Lechler
Reza Razavi
Giovanna Lombardi
Gregory E D Mullen
King's College London · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBGuy's Hospital · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/08/005/25303Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dendritic cells (DCs) generated in vitro to present tumour antigens have been injected in cancer patients to boost in vivo anti-tumour immune responses. This approach to cancer immunotherapy has had limited success. For anti-tumour therapy, delivery and subsequent migration of DCs to lymph nodes leading to effective stimulation of effector T cells is thought to be essential. The ability to non-invasively monitor the fate of adoptively transferred DCs in vivo using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important clinical tool to correlate their in vivo behavior with response to treatment. Previous reports of superparamagnetic iron oxides (SPIOs) labelling of different cell types, including DCs, have indicated varying detrimental effects on cell viability, migration, differentiation and immune function. Here we describe an optimised labelling procedure using a short incubation time and low concentration of clinically used SPIO Endorem to successfully track murine DC migration in vivo using MRI in a mouse tumour model. First, intracellular labelling of bone marrow derived DCs was monitored in vitro using electron microscopy and MRI relaxometry. Second, the in vitro characterisation of SPIO labelled DCs demonstrated that viability, phenotype and functions were comparable to unlabelled DCs. Third, ex vivo SPIO labelled DCs, when injected subcutaneously, allowed for the longitudinal monitoring by MR imaging of their migration in vivo. Fourth, the SPIO DCs induced the proliferation of adoptively transferred CD4(+) T cells but, most importantly, they primed cytotoxic CD8(+) T cell responses to protect against a B16-Ova tumour challenge. Finally, using anatomical information from the MR images, the immigration of DCs was confirmed by the increase in lymph node size post-DC injection. These results demonstrate that the SPIO labelling protocol developed in this study is not detrimental for DC function in vitro and in vivo has potential clinical application in monitoring therapeutic DCs in patients with cancer.

Indexed as

Staining and LabelingVaccinationAnimalsBiological AssayBone Marrow CellsCancer VaccinesCell MovementCell ProliferationCell SurvivalContrast MediaDendritic CellsDextransLymph NodesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetite NanoparticlesMelanoma, ExperimentalCancer VaccinesContrast MediaDextransferumoxidesMagnetite Nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID21637760
PMCPMC3103517
OpenAlexW2091518998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.