Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21637400›Full record

ArticleJRSM short reports2011

Career decision difficulties post foundation training - the medical student perspective.

Vishal Luther

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JRSM short reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MMC Reforms: have they put paid to the pluripotent medical student?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Vishal LutherWhittington Hospital , London Deanery , UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSince 2005, newly qualified doctors in the UK have had their time to prepare for career subspecialization application cut short to 16 months. To have enough time to become a competitive applicant, the choice of specialization may now have to be made as early as in medical school. This study aimed to assess how prepared medical students are towards committing to a specialty while in medical school, and their opinion about having to make such a decision.

designA cross-sectional questionnaire. A list of all career specialties available to doctors at the point of specialization was provided and asked students to rank their top choice. An assessment of the certainty of their choice was then determined.

settingQuestionnaires were distributed at the end of an optional final year medical student academic meeting held at a leading London medical school university.

participantsOne hundred and thirty final year students attended the meeting. Questionnaires were distributed to all attenders; 115 responses were collected.

main outcome measuresThe certainty of career specialization choice was assessed in qualitative form, with responses ranging from 'not likely', 'maybe', 'probably', 'almost certainly' and 'definitely'. Their feelings in having to decide upon career specialty while in medical school was assessed through either a 'yes' or 'no' response.

resultsA total of 115 responses were collected. The second most common selection was the 'undecided' option at 15%. The highest certainty factor occurred at 'maybe' with 41% and progressively fewer responses occurred as the certainty factor increased, with only 10% at 'definitely'; 95% voted 'no' to having to decide what they want to specialize in by the end of medical school.

conclusionsThe majority of students have yet to commit to a specialty and almost all agree that they should not have to decide what they want to specialize in by the end of medical school. There is thus greater responsibility from medical schools to incorporate more career discussions into their syllabus.

Identifiers

PMID21637400
PMCPMC3105460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.