Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21636991›Full record

ArticleBioengineered bugs

Escherichia coli K5 heparosan fermentation and improvement by genetic engineering.

Zhenyu Wang, Jonathan S Dordick, Robert J Linhardt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineered bugs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Heterologous production of chondroitin.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Bioengineered production of glycosaminoglycans and their analogues.Systems microbiology and biomanufacturing · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. New Means to Control Molecular Assembly.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2020
    Article
  14. Engineered heparins as new anticoagulant drugs.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2017
    Review
  15. Bioengineered heparins and heparan sulfates.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhenyu WangDepartment of Biology, Center for Biotechnology & Interdisciplinary Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA.
Jonathan S Dordick
Robert J Linhardt

Funding

Development of a Bioengineered Heparin from a Non-Animal SourceR01HL096972 · NHLBI · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI DORDICK, JONATHAN S., LINHARDT, ROBERT J · 2009 to 2013
$3.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL096972NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL096972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

N-acetyl heparosan is the precursor for the biosynthesis of the important anticoagulant drug heparin. The E. coli K5 capsular heparosan polysaccharide provides a promising precursor for in vitro chemoenzymatic production of bioengineered heparin. This article explores the improvements of heparosan production for bioengineered heparin by fermentation process engineering and genetic engineering.

Indexed as

Bacterial CapsulesEscherichia coliFermentationGenetic EngineeringHeparinModels, BiologicalMolecular Structurecapsular polysaccharide K5Heparin

Identifiers

PMID21636991
PMCPMC3127022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.