Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21636662›Full record

ArticleGenome research2011

Temporal uncoupling of the DNA methylome and transcriptional repression during embryogenesis.

Ozren Bogdanovic, Steven W Long, Simon J van Heeringen, Arie B Brinkman, Jose Luis Gómez-Skarmeta, Hendrik G Stunnenberg, Peter L Jones, Gert Jan C Veenstra

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Epigenomic dynamics of early Xenopus Embryos.Development, growth & differentiation · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Control of zygotic genome activation in Xenopus.Current topics in developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  15. Intergenerational transfer of DNA methylation marks in the honey bee.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ozren BogdanovicDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6500 Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Steven W Long
Simon J van Heeringen
Arie B Brinkman
Jose Luis Gómez-Skarmeta
Hendrik G Stunnenberg
Peter L Jones
Gert Jan C Veenstra
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ES

Funding

Interrogating the Xenopus tropicalis genome using tile path microarraysR01HD054356 · NICHD · STICHTING RADBOUD UNIVERSITEIT · PI VEENSTRA, GERT JAN C. · 2007 to 2011
$1.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD054356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation is a tightly regulated epigenetic mark associated with transcriptional repression. Next-generation sequencing of purified methylated DNA obtained from early Xenopus tropicalis embryos demonstrates that this genome is heavily methylated during blastula and gastrula stages. Although DNA methylation is largely absent from transcriptional start sites marked with histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3), we find both promoters and gene bodies of active genes robustly methylated. In contrast, DNA methylation is absent in large H3K27me3 domains, indicating that these two repression pathways have different roles. Comparison with chromatin state maps of human ES cells reveals strong conservation of epigenetic makeup and gene regulation between the two systems. Strikingly, genes that are highly expressed in pluripotent cells and in Xenopus embryos but not in differentiated cells exhibit relatively high DNA methylation. Therefore, we tested the repressive potential of DNA methylation using transient and transgenic approaches and show that methylated promoters are robustly transcribed in blastula- and gastrula-stage embryos, but not in oocytes or late embryos. These findings have implications for reprogramming and the epigenetic regulation of pluripotency and differentiation and suggest a relatively open, pliable chromatin state in early embryos followed by reestablished methylation-dependent transcriptional repression during organogenesis and differentiation.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticAnimalsCell DifferentiationChromatinDNADNA MethylationEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryonic Stem CellsEmbryo, NonmammalianGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHistonesHumansPromoter Regions, GeneticXenopusChromatinDNAHistones

Identifiers

PMID21636662
PMCPMC3149498
OpenAlexW2158810118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.