Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21636549›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2011

Evaluation of difluoromethylornithine for the chemoprevention of Barrett's esophagus and mucosal dysplasia.

Frank A Sinicrope, Russell Broaddus, Nina Joshi, Eugene Gerner, Elizabeth Half, Ilan Kirsch, Jan Lewin, Bruce Morlan, Waun Ki Hong

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Chemoprevention of esophageal adenocarcinoma.Gastroenterology report · 2020
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Chemoprevention of gastrointestinal neoplasia.Current gastroenterology reports · 2013
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Difluoromethylornithine: the proof is in the polyamines.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2012
    Article
  10. DFMO: targeted risk reduction therapy for colorectal neoplasia.Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology · 2011
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Frank A SinicropeMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. sinicrope.frank@mayo.edu
Russell Broaddus
Nina Joshi
Eugene Gerner
Elizabeth Half
Ilan Kirsch
Jan Lewin
Bruce Morlan
Waun Ki Hong
National Cancer Institute · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) and dysplasia are candidates for chemopreventive strategies to reduce cancer risk. We determined the effects of difluoromethylornithine (DMFO) on mucosal polyamines, gene expression, and histopathology in BE. Ten patients with BE and low-grade dysplasia participated in a single-arm study of DFMO (0.5 g/m(2)/d) given continuously for 6 months. Esophagoscopy with biopsies was conducted at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Dysplasia was graded by a gastrointestinal pathologist. Audiology was assessed (at baseline and at 6 months). Mucosal polyamines were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Microarray-based gene expression was analyzed using a cDNA two-color chip. DFMO suppressed levels of the polyamines putrescine (P = 0.02) and spermidine (P = 0.02) and the spermidine/spermine ratio (P < 0.01) in dysplastic BE (6 months vs. baseline) that persisted at 6 months following drug cessation. Among the top 25 modulated genes, we found those regulating p53-mediated cell signaling (RPL11), cell-cycle regulation (cyclin E2), and cell adhesion and invasion (Plexin1). DFMO downregulated Krüppel-like factor 5 (KLF5), a transcription factor promoting cell proliferation, and suppressed RFC5 whose protein interacts with proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Histopathology showed regression of dysplasia (n = 1), stable disease (n = 8), and progression to high-grade dysplasia (n = 1). Polyamines were suppressed in the responder to a greater extent than in stable cases. DFMO was well tolerated, and one patient had subclinical, unilateral ototoxicity. DFMO suppressed mucosal polyamines and modulated genes that may be mechanistically related to its chemopreventive effect. Further study of DFMO for the chemoprevention of esophageal cancer in BE patients is warranted.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic AgentsBarrett EsophagusEflornithineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMucous MembranePolyaminesPrecancerous ConditionsSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsEflornithinePolyamines

Identifiers

PMID21636549
OpenAlexW2103201375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.