Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21635778›Full record

ArticleBMC developmental biology2011

Genetic basis of wing morphogenesis in Drosophila: sexual dimorphism and non-allometric effects of shape variation.

Valeria P Carreira, Ignacio M Soto, Julián Mensch, Juan J Fanara

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC developmental biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Intraspecific variation in wing geometry amongFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  4. Altitude and life-history shape the evolution of Heliconius wings.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A new approach for investigating venom function applied to venom calreticulin in a parasitoid wasp.Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology · 2015
    Article
  13. Making quantitative morphological variation from basic developmental processes: Where are we? The case of the Drosophila wing.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Fly wing vein patterns have spatial reproducibility of a single cell.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Valeria P CarreiraDepartamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, Pabellón II (C1428 EHA) Buenos Aires, Argentina. vpcarreira@ege.fcen.uba.ar
Ignacio M Soto
Julián Mensch
Juan J Fanara
Fundación Ciencias Exactas y Naturales · ARUniversity of Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Drosophila wing represents a particularly appropriate model to investigate the developmental control of phenotypic variation. Previous studies which aimed to identify candidate genes for wing morphology demonstrated that the genetic basis of wing shape variation in D. melanogaster is composed of numerous genetic factors causing small, additive effects. In this study, we analyzed wing shape in males and females from 191 lines of D. melanogaster, homozygous for a single P-element insertion, using geometric morphometrics techniques. The analysis allowed us to identify known and novel candidate genes that may contribute to the expression of wing shape in each sex separately and to compare them to candidate genes affecting wing size which have been identified previously using the same lines.

resultsOur results indicate that more than 63% of induced mutations affected wing shape in one or both sexes, although only 33% showed significant differences in both males and females. The joint analysis of wing size and shape revealed that only 19% of the P-element insertions caused coincident effects on both components of wing form in one or both sexes. Further morphometrical analyses revealed that the intersection between veins showed the smallest displacements in the proximal region of the wing. Finally, we observed that mutations causing general deformations were more common than expected in both sexes whereas the opposite occurred with those generating local changes. For most of the 94 candidate genes identified, this seems to be the first record relating them with wing shape variation.

conclusionsOur results support the idea that the genetic architecture of wing shape is complex with many different genes contributing to the trait in a sexually dimorphic manner. This polygenic basis, which is relatively independent from that of wing size, is composed of genes generally involved in development and/or metabolic functions, especially related to the regulation of different cellular processes such as motility, adhesion, communication and signal transduction. This study suggests that understanding the genetic basis of wing shape requires merging the regulation of vein patterning by signalling pathways with processes that occur during wing development at the cellular level.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAnimalsBody Weights and MeasuresDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGenotypeMaleMorphogenesisMutationPhenotypeWings, Animal

Identifiers

PMID21635778
PMCPMC3129315
OpenAlexW2117021501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.