Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21635755›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2011

Distinctions in gastric cancer gene expression signatures derived from laser capture microdissection versus histologic macrodissection.

Hark Kyun Kim, Joseph Kim, Susie Korolevich, Il Ju Choi, Chang Hee Kim, David J Munroe, Jeffrey E Green

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Image-guided Coring for Large-scale Studies in Molecular Pathology.Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM · 2016
    Article
  6. SIVQ-LCM protocol for the ArcturusXT instrument.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hark Kyun KimNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Joseph Kim
Susie Korolevich
Il Ju Choi
Chang Hee Kim
David J Munroe
Jeffrey E Green
National Cancer Institute · USScience Applications International Corporation (United States) · USNational Cancer Center · KR

Funding

Intramural NIH HHSPHS HHS HHSN261200800001E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric cancer samples obtained by histologic macrodissection contain a relatively high stromal content that may significantly influence gene expression profiles. Differences between the gene expression signature derived from macrodissected gastric cancer samples and the signature obtained from isolated gastric cancer epithelial cells from the same biopsies using laser-capture microdissection (LCM) were evaluated for their potential experimental biases.

methodsRNA was isolated from frozen tissue samples of gastric cancer biopsies from 20 patients using both histologic macrodissection and LCM techniques. RNA from LCM was subject to an additional round of T7 RNA amplification. Expression profiling was performed using Affymetrix HG-U133A arrays. Genes identified in the expression signatures from each tissue processing method were compared to the set of genes contained within chromosomal regions found to harbor copy number aberrations in the tumor samples by array CGH and to proteins previously identified as being overexpressed in gastric cancer.

resultsGenes shown to have increased copy number in gastric cancer were also found to be overexpressed in samples obtained by macrodissection (LS P value < 10(-5)), but not in array data generated using microdissection. A set of 58 previously identified genes overexpressed in gastric cancer was also enriched in the gene signature identified by macrodissection (LS P < 10(-5)), but not in the signature identified by microdissection (LS P = 0.013). In contrast, 66 genes previously reported to be underexpressed in gastric cancer were enriched in the gene signature identified by microdissection (LS P < 10-5), but not in the signature identified by macrodissection (LS P = 0.89).

conclusionsThe tumor sampling technique biases the microarray results. LCM may be a more sensitive collection and processing method for the identification of potential tumor suppressor gene candidates in gastric cancer using expression profiling.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingLasersComparative Genomic HybridizationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMicrodissectionRNA, MessengerStomach NeoplasmsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID21635755
PMCPMC3141377
OpenAlexW1995965127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.