ReviewExpert opinion on investigational drugs2011
A potential role of ruxolitinib in leukemia.
Review in Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cell line-specific gene network enrichment analysis for interpreting continuous phenotypes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- STAT1-mediated interferon signatures are associated with preclinical JAK inhibitor sensitivity in T-ALL.Blood · 2025Article
- Innovations and Patent Trends in the Development of USFDA Approved Protein Kinase Inhibitors in the Last Two Decades.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- The promise of Janus kinase inhibitors in the treatment of hematological malignancies.Cytokine · 2017Review
- MLN0128, a novel mTOR kinase inhibitor, disrupts survival signaling and triggers apoptosis in AML and AML stem/ progenitor cells.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- Talaromyces (Penicillium) marneffei infection in non-HIV-infected patients.Emerging microbes & infections · 2016Review
- Tumor-selective cytotoxicity of a novel pentadiene analogue on human leukemia/ lymphoma cells.Clinical cancer drugs · 2016Article
- Costimulation Endows Immunotherapeutic CD8 T Cells with IL-36 Responsiveness during Aerobic Glycolysis.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2016Article
- Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: Forefront of the field in 2015.Critical reviews in oncology/hematology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAn increased understanding of cellular signaling pathways, like the JAK?STAT pathway, and the identification of the JAK2 V617F mutation in the classic Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), has generated great interest in the development of targeted JAK2 inhibitors. In a recently completed Phase I?II study, ruxolitinib, a selective orally available JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, has shown efficacy in patients with advanced myelofibrosis. Constitutive activation of the JAK?STAT pathway has also been implicated in other hematological malignancies suggesting a potential role of JAK kinase inhibitors in these malignancies. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews the chemistry, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of ruxolitinib. The literature for this article was retrieved from PubMed database searches using the keywords ?ruxolitinib?, ?INCB 018424?, ?JAK2 inhibitors? and ?leukemia?. EXPERT OPINION: The JAK?STAT signaling pathway plays a vital role in leukemogenesis. Ruxolitinib, a potent JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, known to decrease spleen size and alleviate constitutional symptoms in myelofibrosis, represents a potentially promising agent for the treatment of leukemias by inhibiting the JAK?STAT signaling. Further studies of ruxolitinib, in patients with acute and chronic leukemias, are now needed to establish the clinical usefulness of this promising drug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.