ArticleCritical reviews in toxicology2011
Identifying an indoor air exposure limit for formaldehyde considering both irritation and cancer hazards.
Article in Critical reviews in toxicology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 193 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanistic Insights Into the Formaldehyde Dehydrogenase-Catalyzed Reduction of Formate: A Quantum Chemical Study.ChemPlusChem · 2026Article
- A Comparative Study on Absorption of Gaseous Formaldehyde by Electrospun Biomass Carbon Nanofiber Membranes Modified by Plasma Activation and Chemical Treatment.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effect of indoor air quality on potential risk of obstructive sleep apnea: results from Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Formaldehyde and asthma: a plausibility?Archives of toxicology · 2025Review
- Design Principles From Natural Olfaction for Electronic Noses.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Living Porous Ceramics for Bacteria-Regulated Gas Sensing and Carbon Capture.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Exploring Occupational Health Challenges in Pathology: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Indian Pathologists.Cureus · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive Literature Review on the Effects of Formaldehyde on the Upper Respiratory Tract.Cureus · 2024Review
- The Impact of Air Pollution on Asthma Severity among Residents Living near the Main Industrial Complex in Oman: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Exposure limits for indoor volatile substances concerning the general population: The role of population-based differences in sensory irritation of the eyes and airways for assessment factors.Archives of toxicology · 2024Review
- Real-time, noise and drift resilient formaldehyde sensing at room temperature with aerogel filaments.Science advances · 2024Article
- Toxicological Effects of Secondary Air Pollutants.Chemical research in Chinese universities · 2023Review
- Article
- Impact of primary site on survival in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma from 2004 to 2015.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Recent Advances on the Development of Protein-Based Adhesives for Wood Composite Materials-A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Airborne volatile organic compounds at an e-waste site in Ghana: Source apportionment, exposure and health risks.Journal of hazardous materials · 2021Article
- Reviews in environmental health: How systematic are they?Environment international · 2021Article
- Work-related Hazards Among Pathologists and Residents of Pathology:Results of a Cross-sectional Study in Iran.Iranian journal of pathology · 2021Article
- Occupational exposure and health risks of volatile organic compounds of hotel housekeepers: Field measurements of exposure and health risks.Indoor air · 2021Article
- Comments to "Assessment of formaldehyde levels in relation to respiratory and allergic symptoms in children from Alba County schools, Romania" by Neamtiu et al. (2019).Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Formaldehyde is a well-studied chemical and effects from inhalation exposures have been extensively characterized in numerous controlled studies with human volunteers, including asthmatics and other sensitive individuals, which provide a rich database on exposure concentrations that can reliably produce the symptoms of sensory irritation. Although individuals can differ in their sensitivity to odor and eye irritation, the majority of authoritative reviews of the formaldehyde literature have concluded that an air concentration of 0.3 ppm will provide protection from eye irritation for virtually everyone. A weight of evidence-based formaldehyde exposure limit of 0.1 ppm (100 ppb) is recommended as an indoor air level for all individuals for odor detection and sensory irritation. It has recently been suggested by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the National Toxicology Program (NTP), and the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) that formaldehyde is causally associated with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) and leukemia. This has led US EPA to conclude that irritation is not the most sensitive toxic endpoint and that carcinogenicity should dictate how to establish exposure limits for formaldehyde. In this review, a number of lines of reasoning and substantial scientific evidence are described and discussed, which leads to a conclusion that neither point of contact nor systemic effects of any type, including NPC or leukemia, are causally associated with exposure to formaldehyde. This conclusion supports the view that the equivocal epidemiology studies that suggest otherwise are almost certainly flawed by identified or yet to be unidentified confounding variables. Thus, this assessment concludes that a formaldehyde indoor air limit of 0.1 ppm should protect even particularly susceptible individuals from both irritation effects and any potential cancer hazard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.