ReviewHerz2011
Cardiac side effects of conventional and particle radiotherapy in cancer patients.
Review in Herz, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A "Failed" Assay Development for the Discovery of Rescuing Small Molecules from the Radiation Damage.SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D · 2021Article
- Prospects of nanodentistry for the diagnosis and treatment of maxillofacial pathologies and cancers.Heliyon · 2020Review
- Radiotherapy and anthracyclines - cardiovascular toxicity.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2015Review
- Standard and etiology-directed evidence-based therapies in myocarditis: state of the art and future perspectives.Heart failure reviews · 2013Review
- [Distribution of coronary artery stenosis after radiation for breast cancer].Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2012Article
- Review
- HSA-MnOTechnology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiation therapy, which has become an integral part of modern treatment strategies for many types of cancer in recent decades, is associated with the risk of long-term adverse effects. Particularly in the case of patients with a good prognosis as a result of these modern treatment modalities, avoiding therapy-related side effects plays an increasingly important role. Of these side effects, cardiac complications are particularly relevant since they not only adversely affect quality of life but can also be potentially life-threatening. This review summarizes and critically analyzes the available evidence on the impact of ionizing irradiation on the cardiovascular system. The paper presents an overview of the current knowledge on epidemiological evidence, clinical presentation and risk factors of radiation-induced cardiovascular disease. Additionally, mechanisms of development of this type of complication and strategies for screening, treatment, and avoiding cardiac complications are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21633806What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.