ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2011
Standardization in digital pathology: Supplement 145 of the DICOM standards.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Digital pathology in forensic science: a systematic review of the literature.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Pooled it
- Converting whole slide images from DICOM to ScanScope Virtual Slide-like TIFF: a practical workaround for teaching, research, and collaborative diagnosis.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Comparison and image analysis of different file formats on whole-slide images for colorectal and non-small cell lung carcinomas.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Digital Pathology in Hematopathology: From Vision to Deployment.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Review
- The critical role of standards for AI in digital pathology: Digital Pathology Association Concept Paper.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Report on the 2025 DICOM WSI Connectathon.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- The evolving role of DICOM in digital pathology.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
- AI-Powered Histology for Molecular Profiling in Brain Tumors: Toward Smart Diagnostics from Tissue.Cancers · 2025Review
- Lossy DICOM conversion may affect AI performance.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An update on applications of digital pathology: primary diagnosis; telepathology, education and research.Diagnostic pathology · 2025Review
- Computational pathology: A survey review and the way forward.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Review
- Crossing the Andes: Challenges and opportunities for digital pathology in Latin America.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Review
- MMIR: an open-source software for the registration of multimodal histological images.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Interoperable slide microscopy viewer and annotation tool for imaging data science and computational pathology.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Development of quality assurance program for digital pathology by the Korean Society of Pathologists.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2022Article
- The Role of Pathology-Based Methods in Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches to Cancer Immunotherapy.Cancers · 2022Review
- Software tools and platforms in Digital Pathology: a review for clinicians and computer scientists.Journal of pathology informatics · 2022Review
- Shifting Gears in Precision Oncology-Challenges and Opportunities of Integrative Data Analysis.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- Recommendations for pathologic practice using digital pathology: consensus report of the Korean Society of Pathologists.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2020Review
- Eye tracking reveals expertise-related differences in the time-course of medical image inspection and diagnosis.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As digital slides need a lot of storage space, lack of a singular method to acquire and store these large, two-dimensional images has been a major stumbling block in the universal acceptance of this technology. The DICOMS Standard Committee Working Group 26 has put in a tremendous effort to standardize storage methods so that they are more in line with currently available PACS in most hospitals for storage of radiology images. A recent press release (Supplement 145) of these standards was hailed by one and all involved in the field of digital pathology as it will make it easier for hospitals to integrate digital pathology into their already established systems without adding too much overhead costs. Besides, it will enable different vendors developing the scanners to upgrade their products to storage systems that are common across all systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.