Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21633381›Full record

ArticleNature reviews. Neuroscience2011

Differentiating the rapid actions of cocaine.

Roy A Wise, Eugene A Kiyatkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A large-scale c-Fos brain mapping study on extinction of cocaine-primed reinstatement.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Pharmacokinetics trumps pharmacodynamics during cocaine choice: a reconciliation with the dopamine hypothesis of addiction.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Modeling cocaine relapse in rodents: Behavioral considerations and circuit mechanisms.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Reciprocal Inhibitory Interactions Between the Reward-Related Effects of Leptin and Cocaine.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roy A WiseUS National Institute on Drug Abuse, Behavioral Neuroscience Section, 251 Bayview Boulevard. Baltimore, Maryland 21224, USA. rwise@intra.nida.nih.gov
Eugene A Kiyatkin
National Institute on Drug Abuse · US

Funding

Microdialysis Studies of Self-administrationxZIADA000471 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI WISE, ROY A · 2009 to 2018
$16.4M
Electrophysiological and electrochemical studues of addictive drugsZIADA000566 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI KIYATKIN, EUGENE A · 2010 to 2025
$10.1M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DA000471Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DA000566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The subjective effects of intravenous cocaine are felt almost immediately, and this immediacy plays an important part in the drug's rewarding impact. The primary rewarding effect of cocaine involves blockade of dopamine reuptake; however, the onset of this action is too late to account for the drug's initial effects. Recent studies suggest that cocaine-predictive cues--including peripheral interoceptive cues generated by cocaine itself--come to cause more direct and earlier reward signalling by activating excitatory inputs to the dopamine system. The conditioned activation of the dopamine system by cocaine-predictive cues offers a new target for potential addiction therapies.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAnimalsBrainCocaineHumansRatsSelf AdministrationCocaine

Identifiers

PMID21633381
PMCPMC3155127
OpenAlexW2083539507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.