Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21632550›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2011

Analysis of intact protein isoforms by mass spectrometry.

Jeremiah D Tipton, John C Tran, Adam D Catherman, Dorothy R Ahlf, Kenneth R Durbin, Neil L Kelleher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Experimental Assignment of Disulfide-Bonds in Purified Proteins.Current protocols in protein science · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Standardization of a protocol for shotgun proteomic analysis of saliva.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2018
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Top Down proteomics: facts and perspectives.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2014
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeremiah D TiptonDepartmen of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA.
John C Tran
Adam D Catherman
Dorothy R Ahlf
Kenneth R Durbin
Neil L Kelleher

Funding

The UIUC Neuroproteomics Center on Cell-Cell SignalingP30DA018310 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI Elena V Romanova · 2004 to 2026
$24.9M
Eukaryotic Post-Translational ModificationsR01GM067193 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI KELLEHER, NEIL L · 2003 to 2015
$4.0M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA018310NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diverse proteome of an organism arises from such events as single nucleotide substitutions at the DNA level, different RNA processing, and dynamic enzymatic post-translational modifications. This minireview focuses on the measurement of intact proteins to describe the diversity found in proteomes. The field of biological mass spectrometry has steadily advanced, enabling improvements in the characterization of single proteins to proteins derived from cells or tissues. In this minireview, we discuss the basic technology for "top-down" intact protein analysis. Furthermore, examples of studies involved with the qualitative and quantitative analysis of full-length polypeptides are provided.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansInformaticsMass SpectrometryProtein IsoformsProtein Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID21632550
PMCPMC3138281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.