Thematic minireview series on biological applications of mass spectrometry.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Analysis of Raw Biofluids by Mass Spectrometry Using Microfluidic Diffusion-Based Separation.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2017
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics.2011
• Comment on
  New applications of mass spectrometry in lipid analysis.2011
• Comment on
  Mass spectrometry strategies in metabolomics.2011
• Comment on
  Drug metabolite profiling and identification by high-resolution mass spectrometry.2011
• Comment on
  Imaging of intact tissue sections: moving beyond the microscope.2011
• Comment on
  Analysis of intact protein isoforms by mass spectrometry.2011

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as