Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21632532›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2011

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics.

Fang Xie, Tao Liu, Wei-Jun Qian, Vladislav A Petyuk, Richard D Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. "Omics" and Postmortem Interval Estimation: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Infrared Laser Ablation and Capture of Biological Tissue.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Forensic Proteomics for the Discovery of NewInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fang XieBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, USA.
Tao Liu
Wei-Jun Qian
Vladislav A Petyuk
Richard D Smith

Funding

WORKSHOP AND TRAINING ACTIVITIESP41RR018522 · NCRR · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI SMITH, RICHARD D · 2003 to 2011
$25.1M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR018522NCRR NIH HHS RR018522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

LC-MS-based quantitative proteomics has become increasingly applied to a wide range of biological applications due to growing capabilities for broad proteome coverage and good accuracy and precision in quantification. Herein, we review the current LC-MS-based quantification methods with respect to their advantages and limitations and highlight their potential applications.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromatography, LiquidHumansIsotope LabelingMass SpectrometryProteomicsReference Standards

Identifiers

PMID21632532
PMCPMC3138289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.